2016 Mazda CX-9 II vs. 2013 GMC Acadia I
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2013 GMC Acadia I (facelift 2013)Change Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II and the 2013 GMC Acadia I compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2013 GMC Acadia I comes in at 5101 mm (200.83 in), giving it a 36 mm (1.42 in) (0.7 %) advantage over the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II at 5065 mm (199.41 in). Looking at width, the 2013 GMC Acadia I stretches to 2004 mm (78.90 in), making it 35 mm (1.38 in) (1.7 %) wider than the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II at 1969 mm (77.52 in). As for height, the 2013 GMC Acadia I reaches 1844 mm (72.60 in), which is 128 mm (5.04 in) (6.9 %) taller than the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II at 1716 mm (67.56 in).

Overall, the 2013 GMC Acadia I is longer, wider and taller than the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II.

Length
5065 mm199.4 in
5101 mm200.8 in
Width
1969 mm77.5 in
2004 mm78.9 in
Height
1716 mm67.6 in
1844 mm72.6 in

2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in πŸ”΄ -36 mm-1.4 in (-0.7%)
2013 GMC Acadia I Side View Left
5101 mm200.8 in 🟒 +36 mm+1.4 in (+0.7%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in πŸ”΄ -35 mm-1.4 in (-1.7%)
2013 GMC Acadia I Front View
2004 mm78.9 in 🟒 +35 mm+1.4 in (+1.8%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in πŸ”΄ -128 mm-5.0 in (-6.9%)
2013 GMC Acadia I Rear View
1844 mm72.6 in 🟒 +128 mm+5.0 in (+7.5%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II
2013 GMC Acadia I

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2016
2013

Production:

2016-2023 Discontinued Model
n/a

Dimensions

Length:

5065 mm199.4 in
πŸ”΄ -36 mm-1.4 in (-0.7%) - πŸ”΄ -35 mm-1.4 in (-0.7%)
5101 mm200.8 in
🟒 +35 mm+1.4 in (+0.7%) - 🟒 +36 mm+1.4 in (+0.7%)

Width:

1969 mm77.5 in
πŸ”΄ -35 mm-1.4 in (-1.7%) - πŸ”΄ -34 mm-1.3 in (-1.7%)
2004 mm78.9 in
🟒 +34 mm+1.3 in (+1.7%) - 🟒 +35 mm+1.4 in (+1.8%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

2207 mm86.9 in
-

Height:

1716 mm67.6 in
πŸ”΄ -128 mm-5.0 in (-6.9%)
1844 mm72.6 in
🟒 +128 mm+5.0 in (+7.5%)

Ground Clearance:

216 mm8.5 in
🟒 +22 mm+0.9 in (+11.3%) - 🟒 +23 mm+0.9 in (+11.9%)
193-194 mm7.6-7.6 in
πŸ”΄ -23 mm-0.9 in (-10.6%) - πŸ”΄ -22 mm-0.9 in (-10.2%)

Trunk Capacity:

407 liter14.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -275 liter-9.7 cu ft (-40.3%)
682 liter24.1 cu ft
🟒 +275 liter+9.7 cu ft (+67.6%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

2017 liter71.2 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -1271 liter-44.9 cu ft (-38.7%) - πŸ”΄ -1269 liter-44.8 cu ft (-38.6%)
3286-3288 liter116.0-116.1 cu ft
🟒 +1269 liter+44.8 cu ft (+62.9%) - 🟒 +1271 liter+44.9 cu ft (+63.0%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
πŸ”΄ -363 kg-800 lbs (-16.5%) - πŸ”΄ -143 kg-315 lbs (-6.8%)
2112-2200 kg4656-4850 lbs
🟒 +143 kg+315 lbs (+7.3%) - 🟒 +363 kg+800 lbs (+19.8%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

-
2908-2930 kg6411-6460 lbs

Roof Load:

-
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20
18-inch rims:
  • 7.5J x 18
19-inch rims:
  • 8J x 19
20-inch rims:
  • 7.5J x 20

Tire Size:

  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 255/55 R20 (W:255 | H:55 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R19 (W:255 | H:60 | D:19)
  • 255/65 R18 (W:255 | H:65 | D:18)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car