1967 Ford Mustang I Hardtop vs. 2016 Mazda CX-9 II
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
1967 Ford Mustang I Hardtop (facelift 1966)Change Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 1967 Ford Mustang I Hardtop and the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II comes in at 5065 mm (199.41 in), giving it a 402 mm (15.83 in) (7.9 %) advantage over the 1967 Ford Mustang I Hardtop at 4663 mm (183.58 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II stretches to 1969 mm (77.52 in), making it 168 mm (6.61 in) (8.5 %) wider than the 1967 Ford Mustang I Hardtop at 1801 mm (70.91 in). As for height, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II reaches 1716 mm (67.56 in), which is 405 mm (15.94 in) (23.6 %) taller than the 1967 Ford Mustang I Hardtop at 1311 mm (51.61 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer, wider and taller than the 1967 Ford Mustang I Hardtop.

Length
4663 mm183.6 in
5065 mm199.4 in
Width
1801 mm70.9 in
1969 mm77.5 in
Height
1311 mm51.6 in
1716 mm67.6 in

1967 Ford Mustang I Hardtop Preview
4663 mm183.6 in πŸ”΄ -402 mm-15.8 in (-7.9%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +402 mm+15.8 in (+8.6%)
1967 Ford Mustang I Hardtop Front View
1801 mm70.9 in πŸ”΄ -168 mm-6.6 in (-8.5%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +168 mm+6.6 in (+9.3%)
1967 Ford Mustang I Hardtop Rear View
1311 mm51.6 in πŸ”΄ -405 mm-15.9 in (-23.6%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in 🟒 +405 mm+15.9 in (+30.9%)
1967 Ford Mustang I Hardtop
2016 Mazda CX-9 II

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

Coupe
SUV

Model Year:

1967
2016

Production:

1966-1968 Discontinued Model
2016-2023 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4663 mm183.6 in
πŸ”΄ -402 mm-15.8 in (-7.9%)
5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +402 mm+15.8 in (+8.6%)

Width:

1801 mm70.9 in
πŸ”΄ -168 mm-6.6 in (-8.5%)
1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +168 mm+6.6 in (+9.3%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

-
2207 mm86.9 in

Height:

1311 mm51.6 in
πŸ”΄ -405 mm-15.9 in (-23.6%)
1716 mm67.6 in
🟒 +405 mm+15.9 in (+30.9%)

Ground Clearance:

-
216 mm8.5 in

Trunk Capacity:

261-263 liter9.2-9.3 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -146 liter-5.2 cu ft (-35.9%) - πŸ”΄ -144 liter-5.1 cu ft (-35.4%)
407 liter14.4 cu ft
🟒 +144 liter+5.1 cu ft (+54.8%) - 🟒 +146 liter+5.2 cu ft (+55.9%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

-
2017 liter71.2 cu ft

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1222-1345 kg2694-2965 lbs
πŸ”΄ -747 kg-1647 lbs (-37.9%) - πŸ”΄ -492 kg-1085 lbs (-26.8%)
1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
🟒 +492 kg+1085 lbs (+36.6%) - 🟒 +747 kg+1647 lbs (+61.1%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

-
-

Roof Load:

-
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

14-inch rims:
  • 6J x 14
18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20

Tire Size:

  • 185/75 R14 (W:185 | H:75 | D:14)
  • 205/70 R14 (W:205 | H:70 | D:14)
  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car