2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport III vs 2010 Nissan X-Trail II
2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport III vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail II Dimensions Comparison
Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.
2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport IIIChange Car
2010 Nissan X-Trail II (T31, facelift 2010)Change Car
Here’s how the 2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport III and the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II compare in size:
In terms of length, the 2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport III measures 4785 mm (188.39 in), making it 150 mm (5.91 in) (3.1 %) longer than the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II at 4635 mm (182.48 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport III spans 1815 mm (71.46 in), which is 25 mm (0.98 in) (1.4 %) broader than the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II at 1790 mm (70.47 in). As for height, the 2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport III stands at 1800 mm (70.87 in), giving it an extra 100 mm (3.94 in) (5.6 %) compared to the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II at 1700 mm (66.93 in).
Overall, the 2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport III is longer, wider and taller than the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II.
