2018 MG HS I vs. 2016 Mazda CX-9 II
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2018 MG HS IChange Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2018 MG HS I and the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II comes in at 5065 mm (199.41 in), giving it a 491 mm (19.33 in) (9.7 %) advantage over the 2018 MG HS I at 4574 mm (180.08 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II stretches to 1969 mm (77.52 in), making it 93 mm (3.66 in) (4.7 %) wider than the 2018 MG HS I at 1876 mm (73.86 in). As for height, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II reaches 1716 mm (67.56 in), which is 52 mm (2.05 in) (3.0 %) taller than the 2018 MG HS I at 1664 mm (65.51 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer, wider and taller than the 2018 MG HS I.

Length
4574 mm180.1 in
5065 mm199.4 in
Width
1876 mm73.9 in
1969 mm77.5 in
Height
1664 mm65.5 in
1716 mm67.6 in

2018 MG HS I Preview
4574 mm180.1 in πŸ”΄ -491 mm-19.3 in (-9.7%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +491 mm+19.3 in (+10.7%)
2018 MG HS I Front View
1876 mm73.9 in πŸ”΄ -93 mm-3.7 in (-4.7%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +93 mm+3.7 in (+5.0%)
2018 MG HS I Rear View
1664 mm65.5 in πŸ”΄ -52 mm-2.0 in (-3.0%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in 🟒 +52 mm+2.0 in (+3.1%)
2018 MG HS I
2016 Mazda CX-9 II

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2018
2016

Production:

2018-2020 Discontinued Model
2016-2023 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4574 mm180.1 in
πŸ”΄ -491 mm-19.3 in (-9.7%)
5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +491 mm+19.3 in (+10.7%)

Width:

1876 mm73.9 in
πŸ”΄ -93 mm-3.7 in (-4.7%)
1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +93 mm+3.7 in (+5.0%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

2078 mm81.8 in
πŸ”΄ -129 mm-5.1 in (-5.8%)
2207 mm86.9 in
🟒 +129 mm+5.1 in (+6.2%)

Height:

1664 mm65.5 in
πŸ”΄ -52 mm-2.0 in (-3.0%)
1716 mm67.6 in
🟒 +52 mm+2.0 in (+3.1%)

Ground Clearance:

-
216 mm8.5 in

Trunk Capacity:

448-463 liter15.8-16.4 cu ft
🟒 +41 liter+1.4 cu ft (+10.1%) - 🟒 +56 liter+2.0 cu ft (+13.8%)
407 liter14.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -56 liter-2.0 cu ft (-12.1%) - πŸ”΄ -41 liter-1.4 cu ft (-9.2%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

1287-1454 liter45.4-51.3 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -730 liter-25.8 cu ft (-36.2%) - πŸ”΄ -563 liter-19.9 cu ft (-27.9%)
2017 liter71.2 cu ft
🟒 +563 liter+19.9 cu ft (+38.7%) - 🟒 +730 liter+25.8 cu ft (+56.7%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1489-1737 kg3283-3829 lbs
πŸ”΄ -480 kg-1058 lbs (-24.4%) - πŸ”΄ -100 kg-220 lbs (-5.4%)
1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
🟒 +100 kg+220 lbs (+5.8%) - 🟒 +480 kg+1058 lbs (+32.2%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

2001-2196 kg4411-4841 lbs
-

Roof Load:

75 kg165 lbs
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

  • 17 inches
  • 18 inches
18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20

Tire Size:

  • 215/60 R17 (W:215 | H:60 | D:17)
  • 235/50 R18 (W:235 | H:50 | D:18)
  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car