2013 Mazda CX-5 vs. 2016 Mazda CX-9 II
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2013 Mazda CX-5Change Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2013 Mazda CX-5 and the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II comes in at 5065 mm (199.41 in), giving it a 510 mm (20.08 in) (10.1 %) advantage over the 2013 Mazda CX-5 at 4555 mm (179.33 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II stretches to 1969 mm (77.52 in), making it 129 mm (5.08 in) (6.6 %) wider than the 2013 Mazda CX-5 at 1840 mm (72.44 in). As for height, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II reaches 1716 mm (67.56 in), which is 6 mm (0.24 in) (0.3 %) taller than the 2013 Mazda CX-5 at 1710 mm (67.32 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer, wider and taller than the 2013 Mazda CX-5.

Length
4555 mm179.3 in
5065 mm199.4 in
Width
1840 mm72.4 in
1969 mm77.5 in
Height
1710 mm67.3 in
1716 mm67.6 in

2013 Mazda CX-5 Side View Left
4555 mm179.3 in πŸ”΄ -510 mm-20.1 in (-10.1%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +510 mm+20.1 in (+11.2%)
2013 Mazda CX-5 Front View
1840 mm72.4 in πŸ”΄ -129 mm-5.1 in (-6.6%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +129 mm+5.1 in (+7.0%)
2013 Mazda CX-5 Rear View
1710 mm67.3 in πŸ”΄ -6 mm-0.2 in (-0.3%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in 🟒 +6 mm+0.2 in (+0.4%)
2013 Mazda CX-5
2016 Mazda CX-9 II

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2013
2016

Production:

2012-2015 Discontinued Model
2016-2023 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4555 mm179.3 in
πŸ”΄ -510 mm-20.1 in (-10.1%)
5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +510 mm+20.1 in (+11.2%)

Width:

1840 mm72.4 in
πŸ”΄ -129 mm-5.1 in (-6.6%)
1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +129 mm+5.1 in (+7.0%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

-
2207 mm86.9 in

Height:

1710 mm67.3 in
πŸ”΄ -6 mm-0.2 in (-0.3%)
1716 mm67.6 in
🟒 +6 mm+0.2 in (+0.4%)

Ground Clearance:

210-215 mm8.3-8.5 in
πŸ”΄ -6 mm-0.2 in (-2.8%) - πŸ”΄ -1 mm0.0 in (-0.5%)
216 mm8.5 in
🟒 +1 mm+0.0 in (+0.5%) - 🟒 +6 mm+0.2 in (+2.9%)

Trunk Capacity:

503 liter17.8 cu ft
🟒 +96 liter+3.4 cu ft (+23.6%)
407 liter14.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -96 liter-3.4 cu ft (-19.1%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

1620 liter57.2 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -397 liter-14.0 cu ft (-19.7%)
2017 liter71.2 cu ft
🟒 +397 liter+14.0 cu ft (+24.5%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1315-1602 kg2899-3532 lbs
πŸ”΄ -654 kg-1442 lbs (-33.2%) - πŸ”΄ -235 kg-518 lbs (-12.8%)
1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
🟒 +235 kg+518 lbs (+14.7%) - 🟒 +654 kg+1442 lbs (+49.7%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

1930-2120 kg4255-4674 lbs
-

Roof Load:

50 kg110 lbs
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

17-inch rims:
  • 7J x 17
19-inch rims:
  • 7J x 19
18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20

Tire Size:

  • 225/55 R17 (W:225 | H:55 | D:17)
  • 225/55 R19 (W:225 | H:55 | D:19)
  • 225/65 R17 (W:225 | H:65 | D:17)
  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car