2013 Mazda CX-5 vs. 2010 Mazda 5 II
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2013 Mazda CX-5Change Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2010 Mazda 5 IIChange Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2013 Mazda CX-5 and the 2010 Mazda 5 II compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2010 Mazda 5 II comes in at 4585 mm (180.51 in), giving it a 30 mm (1.18 in) (0.7 %) advantage over the 2013 Mazda CX-5 at 4555 mm (179.33 in). Looking at width, the 2013 Mazda CX-5 spans 1840 mm (72.44 in), which is 90 mm (3.54 in) (4.9 %) broader than the 2010 Mazda 5 II at 1750 mm (68.90 in). As for height, the 2013 Mazda CX-5 stands at 1710 mm (67.32 in), giving it an extra 95 mm (3.74 in) (5.6 %) compared to the 2010 Mazda 5 II at 1615 mm (63.58 in).

Overall, the 2013 Mazda CX-5 is wider and taller than the 2010 Mazda 5 II, while the 2010 Mazda 5 II is longer than the 2013 Mazda CX-5.

Length
4555 mm179.3 in
4585 mm180.5 in
Width
1840 mm72.4 in
1750 mm68.9 in
Height
1710 mm67.3 in
1615 mm63.6 in

2013 Mazda CX-5 Side View Left
4555 mm179.3 in πŸ”΄ -30 mm-1.2 in (-0.7%)
2010 Mazda 5 II Preview
4585 mm180.5 in 🟒 +30 mm+1.2 in (+0.7%)
2013 Mazda CX-5 Front View
1840 mm72.4 in 🟒 +90 mm+3.5 in (+5.1%)
2010 Mazda 5 II Preview
1750 mm68.9 in πŸ”΄ -90 mm-3.5 in (-4.9%)
2013 Mazda CX-5 Rear View
1710 mm67.3 in 🟒 +95 mm+3.7 in (+5.9%)
2010 Mazda 5 II Preview
1615 mm63.6 in πŸ”΄ -95 mm-3.7 in (-5.6%)
2013 Mazda CX-5
2010 Mazda 5 II

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
Minivan

Model Year:

2013
2010

Production:

2012-2015 Discontinued Model
2010-2017 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4555 mm179.3 in
πŸ”΄ -30 mm-1.2 in (-0.7%)
4585 mm180.5 in
🟒 +30 mm+1.2 in (+0.7%)

Width:

1840 mm72.4 in
🟒 +90 mm+3.5 in (+5.1%)
1750 mm68.9 in
πŸ”΄ -90 mm-3.5 in (-4.9%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

-
-

Height:

1710 mm67.3 in
🟒 +95 mm+3.7 in (+5.9%)
1615 mm63.6 in
πŸ”΄ -95 mm-3.7 in (-5.6%)

Ground Clearance:

210-215 mm8.3-8.5 in
🟒 +70 mm+2.8 in (+50.0%) - 🟒 +85 mm+3.3 in (+65.4%)
130-140 mm5.1-5.5 in
πŸ”΄ -85 mm-3.3 in (-39.5%) - πŸ”΄ -70 mm-2.8 in (-33.3%)

Trunk Capacity:

503 liter17.8 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -754 liter-26.6 cu ft (-60.0%) - 🟒 +391 liter+13.8 cu ft (+349.1%)
112-1257 liter4.0-44.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -391 liter-13.8 cu ft (-77.7%) - 🟒 +754 liter+26.6 cu ft (+149.9%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

1620 liter57.2 cu ft
🟒 +23 liter+0.8 cu ft (+1.4%) - 🟒 +135 liter+4.8 cu ft (+9.1%)
1485-1597 liter52.4-56.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -135 liter-4.8 cu ft (-8.3%) - πŸ”΄ -23 liter-0.8 cu ft (-1.4%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1315-1602 kg2899-3532 lbs
πŸ”΄ -253 kg-558 lbs (-16.1%) - 🟒 +207 kg+456 lbs (+14.8%)
1395-1568 kg3075-3457 lbs
πŸ”΄ -207 kg-456 lbs (-12.9%) - 🟒 +253 kg+558 lbs (+19.2%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

1930-2120 kg4255-4674 lbs
πŸ”΄ -195 kg-430 lbs (-9.2%) - 🟒 +35 kg+77 lbs (+1.7%)
2085-2125 kg4597-4685 lbs
πŸ”΄ -35 kg-77 lbs (-1.7%) - 🟒 +195 kg+430 lbs (+10.1%)

Roof Load:

50 kg110 lbs
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

17-inch rims:
  • 7J x 17
19-inch rims:
  • 7J x 19
15-inch rims:
  • 15
16-inch rims:
  • 16
  • 6.5J x 16
17-inch rims:
  • 17
  • 6.5J x 17

Tire Size:

  • 225/55 R17 (W:225 | H:55 | D:17)
  • 225/55 R19 (W:225 | H:55 | D:19)
  • 225/65 R17 (W:225 | H:65 | D:17)
  • 195/65 R15 (W:195 | H:65 | D:15)
  • 205/50 R17 (W:205 | H:50 | D:17)
  • 205/55 R16 (W:205 | H:55 | D:16)
  • 205/60 R16 (W:205 | H:60 | D:16)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car