Compare Dimensions
2017 Mazda CX-5 II vs. 2015 Mazda CX-3

Here’s how 2017 Mazda CX-5 II and 2015 Mazda CX-3 compare in size: 2017 Mazda CX-5 II is longer than 2015 Mazda CX-3, offering more overall body length. 2017 Mazda CX-5 II is wider than 2015 Mazda CX-3, which may translate to more cabin space or road presence. 2017 Mazda CX-5 II is taller than 2015 Mazda CX-3, which could improve headroom or visibility.

Length
4550 mm179.1 in
4275 mm168.3 in
Width
1841 mm72.5 in
1765 mm69.5 in
Height
1680 mm66.1 in
1535 mm60.4 in

2017 Mazda CX-5 II Side View Left
4550 mm179.1 in 🟒 +275 mm+10.8 in (+6.4%)
2015 Mazda CX-3 Side View Left
4275 mm168.3 in πŸ”΄ -275 mm-10.8 in (-6.0%)
2017 Mazda CX-5 II Front View
1841 mm72.5 in 🟒 +76 mm+3.0 in (+4.3%)
2015 Mazda CX-3 Front View
1765 mm69.5 in πŸ”΄ -76 mm-3.0 in (-4.1%)
2017 Mazda CX-5 II Rear View
1680 mm66.1 in 🟒 +145 mm+5.7 in (+9.4%)
2015 Mazda CX-3 Rear View
1535 mm60.4 in πŸ”΄ -145 mm-5.7 in (-8.6%)
2017 Mazda CX-5 II
2015 Mazda CX-3

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2017
2015

Production:

2017-2021 Discontinued Model
2015-2018 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4550 mm179.1 in
🟒 +274 mm+10.8 in (+6.4%) - 🟒 +275 mm+10.8 in (+6.4%)
4275 mm168.3 in
πŸ”΄ -275 mm-10.8 in (-6.0%) - πŸ”΄ -274 mm-10.8 in (-6.0%)

Width:

1841 mm72.5 in
🟒 +75 mm+3.0 in (+4.2%) - 🟒 +76 mm+3.0 in (+4.3%)
1765 mm69.5 in
πŸ”΄ -76 mm-3.0 in (-4.1%) - πŸ”΄ -75 mm-3.0 in (-4.1%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

2116 mm83.3 in
🟒 +66 mm+2.6 in (+3.2%) - 🟒 +67 mm+2.6 in (+3.3%)
2049 mm80.7 in
πŸ”΄ -67 mm-2.6 in (-3.2%) - πŸ”΄ -66 mm-2.6 in (-3.1%)

Height:

1680 mm66.1 in
🟒 +140 mm+5.5 in (+9.1%) - 🟒 +145 mm+5.7 in (+9.4%)
1535 mm60.4 in
πŸ”΄ -145 mm-5.7 in (-8.6%) - πŸ”΄ -140 mm-5.5 in (-8.4%)

Ground Clearance:

185-193 mm7.3-7.6 in
🟒 +30 mm+1.2 in (+19.4%) - 🟒 +38 mm+1.5 in (+24.5%)
155 mm6.1 in
πŸ”΄ -38 mm-1.5 in (-19.7%) - πŸ”΄ -30 mm-1.2 in (-16.2%)

Trunk Capacity:

442-875 liter15.6-30.9 cu ft
🟒 +92 liter+3.2 cu ft (+26.3%) - 🟒 +525 liter+18.5 cu ft (+150.0%)
350 liter12.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -525 liter-18.5 cu ft (-60.0%) - πŸ”΄ -92 liter-3.2 cu ft (-20.8%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

1342-1688 liter47.4-59.6 cu ft
🟒 +82 liter+2.9 cu ft (+6.5%) - 🟒 +428 liter+15.1 cu ft (+34.0%)
1260 liter44.5 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -428 liter-15.1 cu ft (-25.4%) - πŸ”΄ -82 liter-2.9 cu ft (-6.1%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1435-1735 kg3164-3825 lbs
πŸ”΄ -115 kg-254 lbs (-7.4%) - 🟒 +580 kg+1279 lbs (+50.2%)
1155-1550 kg2546-3417 lbs
πŸ”΄ -580 kg-1279 lbs (-33.4%) - 🟒 +115 kg+254 lbs (+8.0%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

1990-2235 kg4387-4927 lbs
πŸ”΄ -80 kg-176 lbs (-3.9%) - 🟒 +545 kg+1202 lbs (+32.2%)
1690-2070 kg3726-4564 lbs
πŸ”΄ -545 kg-1202 lbs (-24.4%) - 🟒 +80 kg+176 lbs (+4.0%)

Roof Load:

50 kg110 lbs
50 kg110 lbs

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

17-inch rims:
  • 17
  • 7J x 17
19-inch rims:
  • 7J x 19
  • 19
n/a

Tire Size:

  • 225/55 R19 (W:225 | H:55 | D:19)
  • 225/65 R17 (W:225 | H:65 | D:17)
n/a

Related Comparisons

Quickly compare the size of two vehicles by entering their names in the respective input fields. Hit Compare to view their dimensions head-to-head. Feeling adventurous? Click the Random button for a surprise comparison.

      Small red car