2014 Mazda 2 III vs. 2016 Mazda CX-9 II
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2014 Mazda 2 III (DJ)Change Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2014 Mazda 2 III and the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II comes in at 5065 mm (199.41 in), giving it a 1005 mm (39.57 in) (19.8 %) advantage over the 2014 Mazda 2 III at 4060 mm (159.84 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II stretches to 1969 mm (77.52 in), making it 274 mm (10.79 in) (13.9 %) wider than the 2014 Mazda 2 III at 1695 mm (66.73 in). As for height, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II reaches 1716 mm (67.56 in), which is 221 mm (8.70 in) (12.9 %) taller than the 2014 Mazda 2 III at 1495 mm (58.86 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer, wider and taller than the 2014 Mazda 2 III.

Length
4060 mm159.8 in
5065 mm199.4 in
Width
1695 mm66.7 in
1969 mm77.5 in
Height
1495 mm58.9 in
1716 mm67.6 in

2014 Mazda 2 III Side View Left
4060 mm159.8 in πŸ”΄ -1005 mm-39.6 in (-19.8%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +1005 mm+39.6 in (+24.8%)
2014 Mazda 2 III Front View
1695 mm66.7 in πŸ”΄ -274 mm-10.8 in (-13.9%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +274 mm+10.8 in (+16.2%)
2014 Mazda 2 III Rear View
1495 mm58.9 in πŸ”΄ -221 mm-8.7 in (-12.9%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in 🟒 +221 mm+8.7 in (+14.8%)
2014 Mazda 2 III
2016 Mazda CX-9 II

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

Hatchback
SUV

Model Year:

2014
2016

Production:

2014-2019 Discontinued Model
2016-2023 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4060 mm159.8 in
πŸ”΄ -1005 mm-39.6 in (-19.8%)
5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +1005 mm+39.6 in (+24.8%)

Width:

1695 mm66.7 in
πŸ”΄ -274 mm-10.8 in (-13.9%)
1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +274 mm+10.8 in (+16.2%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

1983 mm78.1 in
πŸ”΄ -224 mm-8.8 in (-10.1%)
2207 mm86.9 in
🟒 +224 mm+8.8 in (+11.3%)

Height:

1495 mm58.9 in
πŸ”΄ -221 mm-8.7 in (-12.9%)
1716 mm67.6 in
🟒 +221 mm+8.7 in (+14.8%)

Ground Clearance:

143 mm5.6 in
πŸ”΄ -73 mm-2.9 in (-33.8%)
216 mm8.5 in
🟒 +73 mm+2.9 in (+51.0%)

Trunk Capacity:

280 liter9.9 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -127 liter-4.5 cu ft (-31.2%)
407 liter14.4 cu ft
🟒 +127 liter+4.5 cu ft (+45.4%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

950 liter33.5 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -1067 liter-37.7 cu ft (-52.9%)
2017 liter71.2 cu ft
🟒 +1067 liter+37.7 cu ft (+112.3%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

970-1040 kg2138-2293 lbs
πŸ”΄ -999 kg-2202 lbs (-50.7%) - πŸ”΄ -797 kg-1757 lbs (-43.4%)
1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
🟒 +797 kg+1757 lbs (+76.6%) - 🟒 +999 kg+2202 lbs (+103.0%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

1500-1575 kg3307-3472 lbs
-

Roof Load:

-
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

  • 15 inches
  • 16 inches
18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20

Tire Size:

  • 185/60 R16 (W:185 | H:60 | D:16)
  • 185/65 R15 (W:185 | H:65 | D:15)
  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car