2016 Mazda CX-9 II vs. 2012 Chevrolet Traverse I
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2012 Chevrolet Traverse I (facelift 2012)Change Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II and the 2012 Chevrolet Traverse I compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2012 Chevrolet Traverse I comes in at 5173 mm (203.66 in), giving it a 108 mm (4.25 in) (2.1 %) advantage over the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II at 5065 mm (199.41 in). Looking at width, the 2012 Chevrolet Traverse I stretches to 1993 mm (78.46 in), making it 24 mm (0.94 in) (1.2 %) wider than the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II at 1969 mm (77.52 in). As for height, the 2012 Chevrolet Traverse I reaches 1792 mm (70.55 in), which is 76 mm (2.99 in) (4.2 %) taller than the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II at 1716 mm (67.56 in).

Overall, the 2012 Chevrolet Traverse I is longer, wider and taller than the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II.

Length
5065 mm199.4 in
5173 mm203.7 in
Width
1969 mm77.5 in
1993 mm78.5 in
Height
1716 mm67.6 in
1792 mm70.6 in

2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in πŸ”΄ -108 mm-4.3 in (-2.1%)
2012 Chevrolet Traverse I Side View Left
5173 mm203.7 in 🟒 +108 mm+4.3 in (+2.1%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in πŸ”΄ -24 mm-0.9 in (-1.2%)
2012 Chevrolet Traverse I Front View
1993 mm78.5 in 🟒 +24 mm+0.9 in (+1.2%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in πŸ”΄ -76 mm-3.0 in (-4.2%)
2012 Chevrolet Traverse I Rear View
1792 mm70.6 in 🟒 +76 mm+3.0 in (+4.4%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II
2012 Chevrolet Traverse I

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2016
2012

Production:

2016-2023 Discontinued Model
2012-2017 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

5065 mm199.4 in
πŸ”΄ -108 mm-4.3 in (-2.1%)
5173 mm203.7 in
🟒 +108 mm+4.3 in (+2.1%)

Width:

1969 mm77.5 in
-

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

2207 mm86.9 in
🟒 +214 mm+8.4 in (+10.7%)
1993 mm78.5 in
πŸ”΄ -214 mm-8.4 in (-9.7%)

Height:

1716 mm67.6 in
πŸ”΄ -76 mm-3.0 in (-4.2%)
1792 mm70.6 in
🟒 +76 mm+3.0 in (+4.4%)

Ground Clearance:

216 mm8.5 in
🟒 +33 mm+1.3 in (+18.0%)
183 mm7.2 in
πŸ”΄ -33 mm-1.3 in (-15.3%)

Trunk Capacity:

407 liter14.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -284 liter-10.0 cu ft (-41.1%)
691 liter24.4 cu ft
🟒 +284 liter+10.0 cu ft (+69.8%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

2017 liter71.2 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -1276 liter-45.1 cu ft (-38.7%)
3293 liter116.3 cu ft
🟒 +1276 liter+45.1 cu ft (+63.3%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
πŸ”΄ -411 kg-906 lbs (-18.3%) - πŸ”΄ -169 kg-373 lbs (-7.9%)
2138-2248 kg4713-4956 lbs
🟒 +169 kg+373 lbs (+8.6%) - 🟒 +411 kg+906 lbs (+22.4%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

-
2908-2930 kg6411-6460 lbs

Roof Load:

-
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20
17-inch rims:
  • 7J x 17
18-inch rims:
  • 7.5J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8J x 20

Tire Size:

  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 245/70 R17 (W:245 | H:70 | D:17)
  • 255/55 R20 (W:255 | H:55 | D:20)
  • 255/65 R18 (W:255 | H:65 | D:18)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car