2016 Mazda CX-9 II vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2013 Mazda CX-5Change Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II and the 2013 Mazda CX-5 compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II measures 5065 mm (199.41 in), making it 510 mm (20.08 in) (10.1 %) longer than the 2013 Mazda CX-5 at 4555 mm (179.33 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II spans 1969 mm (77.52 in), which is 129 mm (5.08 in) (6.6 %) broader than the 2013 Mazda CX-5 at 1840 mm (72.44 in). As for height, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II stands at 1716 mm (67.56 in), giving it an extra 6 mm (0.24 in) (0.3 %) compared to the 2013 Mazda CX-5 at 1710 mm (67.32 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer, wider and taller than the 2013 Mazda CX-5.

Length
5065 mm199.4 in
4555 mm179.3 in
Width
1969 mm77.5 in
1840 mm72.4 in
Height
1716 mm67.6 in
1710 mm67.3 in

2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +510 mm+20.1 in (+11.2%)
2013 Mazda CX-5 Side View Left
4555 mm179.3 in πŸ”΄ -510 mm-20.1 in (-10.1%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +129 mm+5.1 in (+7.0%)
2013 Mazda CX-5 Front View
1840 mm72.4 in πŸ”΄ -129 mm-5.1 in (-6.6%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in 🟒 +6 mm+0.2 in (+0.4%)
2013 Mazda CX-5 Rear View
1710 mm67.3 in πŸ”΄ -6 mm-0.2 in (-0.3%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II
2013 Mazda CX-5

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2016
2013

Production:

2016-2023 Discontinued Model
2012-2015 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +510 mm+20.1 in (+11.2%)
4555 mm179.3 in
πŸ”΄ -510 mm-20.1 in (-10.1%)

Width:

1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +129 mm+5.1 in (+7.0%)
1840 mm72.4 in
πŸ”΄ -129 mm-5.1 in (-6.6%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

2207 mm86.9 in
-

Height:

1716 mm67.6 in
🟒 +6 mm+0.2 in (+0.4%)
1710 mm67.3 in
πŸ”΄ -6 mm-0.2 in (-0.3%)

Ground Clearance:

216 mm8.5 in
🟒 +1 mm+0.0 in (+0.5%) - 🟒 +6 mm+0.2 in (+2.9%)
210-215 mm8.3-8.5 in
πŸ”΄ -6 mm-0.2 in (-2.8%) - πŸ”΄ -1 mm0.0 in (-0.5%)

Trunk Capacity:

407 liter14.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -96 liter-3.4 cu ft (-19.1%)
503 liter17.8 cu ft
🟒 +96 liter+3.4 cu ft (+23.6%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

2017 liter71.2 cu ft
🟒 +397 liter+14.0 cu ft (+24.5%)
1620 liter57.2 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -397 liter-14.0 cu ft (-19.7%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
🟒 +235 kg+518 lbs (+14.7%) - 🟒 +654 kg+1442 lbs (+49.7%)
1315-1602 kg2899-3532 lbs
πŸ”΄ -654 kg-1442 lbs (-33.2%) - πŸ”΄ -235 kg-518 lbs (-12.8%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

-
1930-2120 kg4255-4674 lbs

Roof Load:

-
50 kg110 lbs

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20
17-inch rims:
  • 7J x 17
19-inch rims:
  • 7J x 19

Tire Size:

  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 225/55 R17 (W:225 | H:55 | D:17)
  • 225/55 R19 (W:225 | H:55 | D:19)
  • 225/65 R17 (W:225 | H:65 | D:17)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car