2016 Mazda CX-9 II vs. 2014 Mazda 2 III
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2014 Mazda 2 III (DJ)Change Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II and the 2014 Mazda 2 III compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II measures 5065 mm (199.41 in), making it 1005 mm (39.57 in) (19.8 %) longer than the 2014 Mazda 2 III at 4060 mm (159.84 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II spans 1969 mm (77.52 in), which is 274 mm (10.79 in) (13.9 %) broader than the 2014 Mazda 2 III at 1695 mm (66.73 in). As for height, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II stands at 1716 mm (67.56 in), giving it an extra 221 mm (8.70 in) (12.9 %) compared to the 2014 Mazda 2 III at 1495 mm (58.86 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer, wider and taller than the 2014 Mazda 2 III.

Length
5065 mm199.4 in
4060 mm159.8 in
Width
1969 mm77.5 in
1695 mm66.7 in
Height
1716 mm67.6 in
1495 mm58.9 in

2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +1005 mm+39.6 in (+24.8%)
2014 Mazda 2 III Side View Left
4060 mm159.8 in πŸ”΄ -1005 mm-39.6 in (-19.8%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +274 mm+10.8 in (+16.2%)
2014 Mazda 2 III Front View
1695 mm66.7 in πŸ”΄ -274 mm-10.8 in (-13.9%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in 🟒 +221 mm+8.7 in (+14.8%)
2014 Mazda 2 III Rear View
1495 mm58.9 in πŸ”΄ -221 mm-8.7 in (-12.9%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II
2014 Mazda 2 III

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
Hatchback

Model Year:

2016
2014

Production:

2016-2023 Discontinued Model
2014-2019 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +1005 mm+39.6 in (+24.8%)
4060 mm159.8 in
πŸ”΄ -1005 mm-39.6 in (-19.8%)

Width:

1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +274 mm+10.8 in (+16.2%)
1695 mm66.7 in
πŸ”΄ -274 mm-10.8 in (-13.9%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

2207 mm86.9 in
🟒 +224 mm+8.8 in (+11.3%)
1983 mm78.1 in
πŸ”΄ -224 mm-8.8 in (-10.1%)

Height:

1716 mm67.6 in
🟒 +221 mm+8.7 in (+14.8%)
1495 mm58.9 in
πŸ”΄ -221 mm-8.7 in (-12.9%)

Ground Clearance:

216 mm8.5 in
🟒 +73 mm+2.9 in (+51.0%)
143 mm5.6 in
πŸ”΄ -73 mm-2.9 in (-33.8%)

Trunk Capacity:

407 liter14.4 cu ft
🟒 +127 liter+4.5 cu ft (+45.4%)
280 liter9.9 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -127 liter-4.5 cu ft (-31.2%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

2017 liter71.2 cu ft
🟒 +1067 liter+37.7 cu ft (+112.3%)
950 liter33.5 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -1067 liter-37.7 cu ft (-52.9%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
🟒 +797 kg+1757 lbs (+76.6%) - 🟒 +999 kg+2202 lbs (+103.0%)
970-1040 kg2138-2293 lbs
πŸ”΄ -999 kg-2202 lbs (-50.7%) - πŸ”΄ -797 kg-1757 lbs (-43.4%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

-
1500-1575 kg3307-3472 lbs

Roof Load:

-
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20
  • 15 inches
  • 16 inches

Tire Size:

  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 185/60 R16 (W:185 | H:60 | D:16)
  • 185/65 R15 (W:185 | H:65 | D:15)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car