2016 Mazda CX-9 II vs. 2014 BMW X6
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2014 BMW X6 (F16)Change Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II and the 2014 BMW X6 compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II measures 5065 mm (199.41 in), making it 156 mm (6.14 in) (3.1 %) longer than the 2014 BMW X6 at 4909 mm (193.27 in). Looking at width, the 2014 BMW X6 stretches to 1989 mm (78.31 in), making it 20 mm (0.79 in) (1.0 %) wider than the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II at 1969 mm (77.52 in). As for height, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II stands at 1716 mm (67.56 in), giving it an extra 14 mm (0.55 in) (0.8 %) compared to the 2014 BMW X6 at 1702 mm (67.01 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer and taller than the 2014 BMW X6, while the 2014 BMW X6 is wider than the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II.

Length
5065 mm199.4 in
4909 mm193.3 in
Width
1969 mm77.5 in
1989 mm78.3 in
Height
1716 mm67.6 in
1702 mm67.0 in

2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +156 mm+6.1 in (+3.2%)
2014 BMW X6 Preview
4909 mm193.3 in πŸ”΄ -156 mm-6.1 in (-3.1%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in πŸ”΄ -20 mm-0.8 in (-1.0%)
2014 BMW X6 Front View
1989 mm78.3 in 🟒 +20 mm+0.8 in (+1.0%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in 🟒 +14 mm+0.6 in (+0.8%)
2014 BMW X6 Rear View
1702 mm67.0 in πŸ”΄ -14 mm-0.6 in (-0.8%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II
2014 BMW X6

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2016
2014

Production:

2016-2023 Discontinued Model
2014-2018 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +156 mm+6.1 in (+3.2%)
4909 mm193.3 in
πŸ”΄ -156 mm-6.1 in (-3.1%)

Width:

1969 mm77.5 in
πŸ”΄ -20 mm-0.8 in (-1.0%)
1989 mm78.3 in
🟒 +20 mm+0.8 in (+1.0%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

2207 mm86.9 in
🟒 +37 mm+1.5 in (+1.7%)
2170 mm85.4 in
πŸ”΄ -37 mm-1.5 in (-1.7%)

Height:

1716 mm67.6 in
🟒 +14 mm+0.6 in (+0.8%)
1702 mm67.0 in
πŸ”΄ -14 mm-0.6 in (-0.8%)

Ground Clearance:

216 mm8.5 in
🟒 +4 mm+0.2 in (+1.9%)
212 mm8.3 in
πŸ”΄ -4 mm-0.2 in (-1.9%)

Trunk Capacity:

407 liter14.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -143 liter-5.0 cu ft (-26.0%)
550 liter19.4 cu ft
🟒 +143 liter+5.0 cu ft (+35.1%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

2017 liter71.2 cu ft
🟒 +492 liter+17.4 cu ft (+32.3%)
1525 liter53.9 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -492 liter-17.4 cu ft (-24.4%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
πŸ”΄ -348 kg-767 lbs (-15.9%) - πŸ”΄ -56 kg-123 lbs (-2.8%)
2025-2185 kg4464-4817 lbs
🟒 +56 kg+123 lbs (+2.8%) - 🟒 +348 kg+767 lbs (+18.9%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

-
2740-2900 kg6041-6393 lbs

Roof Load:

-
100 kg220 lbs

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20
19-inch rims:
  • 9J x 19
  • 10J x 19
20-inch rims:
  • 10J x 20
  • 11J x 20

Tire Size:

  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 255/50 R19 (W:255 | H:50 | D:19)
  • 275/40 R20 (W:275 | H:40 | D:20)
  • 285/45 R19 (W:285 | H:45 | D:19)
  • 315/35 R20 (W:315 | H:35 | D:20)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car