2016 Mazda CX-9 II vs. 2003 Volvo XC90
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2003 Volvo XC90Change Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II and the 2003 Volvo XC90 compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II measures 5065 mm (199.41 in), making it 258 mm (10.16 in) (5.1 %) longer than the 2003 Volvo XC90 at 4807 mm (189.25 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II spans 1969 mm (77.52 in), which is 33 mm (1.30 in) (1.7 %) broader than the 2003 Volvo XC90 at 1936 mm (76.22 in). As for height, the 2003 Volvo XC90 reaches 1784 mm (70.24 in), which is 68 mm (2.68 in) (3.8 %) taller than the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II at 1716 mm (67.56 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer and wider than the 2003 Volvo XC90, while the 2003 Volvo XC90 is taller than the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II.

Length
5065 mm199.4 in
4807 mm189.3 in
Width
1969 mm77.5 in
1936 mm76.2 in
Height
1716 mm67.6 in
1784 mm70.2 in

2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +258 mm+10.2 in (+5.4%)
2003 Volvo XC90 Side View Left
4807 mm189.3 in πŸ”΄ -258 mm-10.2 in (-5.1%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +33 mm+1.3 in (+1.7%)
2003 Volvo XC90 Front View
1936 mm76.2 in πŸ”΄ -33 mm-1.3 in (-1.7%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in πŸ”΄ -68 mm-2.7 in (-3.8%)
2003 Volvo XC90 Rear View
1784 mm70.2 in 🟒 +68 mm+2.7 in (+4.0%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II
2003 Volvo XC90

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2016
2003

Production:

2016-2023 Discontinued Model
2002-2006 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +258 mm+10.2 in (+5.4%) - 🟒 +265 mm+10.4 in (+5.5%)
4800-4807 mm189.0-189.3 in
πŸ”΄ -265 mm-10.4 in (-5.2%) - πŸ”΄ -258 mm-10.2 in (-5.1%)

Width:

1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +33 mm+1.3 in (+1.7%) - 🟒 +79 mm+3.1 in (+4.2%)
1890-1936 mm74.4-76.2 in
πŸ”΄ -79 mm-3.1 in (-4.0%) - πŸ”΄ -33 mm-1.3 in (-1.7%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

2207 mm86.9 in
-

Height:

1716 mm67.6 in
πŸ”΄ -68 mm-2.7 in (-3.8%) - πŸ”΄ -24 mm-0.9 in (-1.4%)
1740-1784 mm68.5-70.2 in
🟒 +24 mm+0.9 in (+1.4%) - 🟒 +68 mm+2.7 in (+4.0%)

Ground Clearance:

216 mm8.5 in
-

Trunk Capacity:

407 liter14.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -206 liter-7.3 cu ft (-33.6%) - 🟒 +158 liter+5.6 cu ft (+63.5%)
249-613 liter8.8-21.6 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -158 liter-5.6 cu ft (-38.8%) - 🟒 +206 liter+7.3 cu ft (+50.6%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

2017 liter71.2 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -387 liter-13.7 cu ft (-16.1%)
2404 liter84.9 cu ft
🟒 +387 liter+13.7 cu ft (+19.2%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
πŸ”΄ -381 kg-840 lbs (-17.2%) - πŸ”΄ -16 kg-35 lbs (-0.8%)
1985-2218 kg4376-4890 lbs
🟒 +16 kg+35 lbs (+0.8%) - 🟒 +381 kg+840 lbs (+20.7%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

-
2620-2800 kg5776-6173 lbs

Roof Load:

-
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20
  • 16 inches
  • 17 inches
  • 18 inches

Tire Size:

  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 225/70 R16 (W:225 | H:70 | D:16)
  • 235/60 R18 (W:235 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 235/65 R17 (W:235 | H:65 | D:17)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car