2016 Mazda CX-9 II vs. 1965 Ford Mustang I
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Car #2 Preview Image
1965 Ford Mustang IChange Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II and the 1965 Ford Mustang I compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II measures 5065 mm (199.41 in), making it 452 mm (17.80 in) (8.9 %) longer than the 1965 Ford Mustang I at 4613 mm (181.61 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II spans 1969 mm (77.52 in), which is 237 mm (9.33 in) (12.0 %) broader than the 1965 Ford Mustang I at 1732 mm (68.19 in). As for height, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II stands at 1716 mm (67.56 in), giving it an extra 418 mm (16.46 in) (24.4 %) compared to the 1965 Ford Mustang I at 1298 mm (51.10 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer, wider and taller than the 1965 Ford Mustang I.

Length
5065 mm199.4 in
4613 mm181.6 in
Width
1969 mm77.5 in
1732 mm68.2 in
Height
1716 mm67.6 in
1298 mm51.1 in

2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +452 mm+17.8 in (+9.8%)
1965 Ford Mustang I Preview
4613 mm181.6 in πŸ”΄ -452 mm-17.8 in (-8.9%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +237 mm+9.3 in (+13.7%)
1965 Ford Mustang I Rear View
1732 mm68.2 in πŸ”΄ -237 mm-9.3 in (-12.0%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in 🟒 +418 mm+16.5 in (+32.2%)
1965 Ford Mustang I Rear View
1298 mm51.1 in πŸ”΄ -418 mm-16.5 in (-24.4%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II
1965 Ford Mustang I

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
Coupe

Model Year:

2016
1965

Production:

2016-2023 Discontinued Model
1964-1967 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +452 mm+17.8 in (+9.8%)
4613 mm181.6 in
πŸ”΄ -452 mm-17.8 in (-8.9%)

Width:

1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +237 mm+9.3 in (+13.7%)
1732 mm68.2 in
πŸ”΄ -237 mm-9.3 in (-12.0%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

2207 mm86.9 in
-

Height:

1716 mm67.6 in
🟒 +418 mm+16.5 in (+32.2%)
1298 mm51.1 in
πŸ”΄ -418 mm-16.5 in (-24.4%)

Ground Clearance:

216 mm8.5 in
-

Trunk Capacity:

407 liter14.4 cu ft
🟒 +166 liter+5.9 cu ft (+68.9%)
241 liter8.5 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -166 liter-5.9 cu ft (-40.8%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

2017 liter71.2 cu ft
🟒 +1493 liter+52.7 cu ft (+284.9%)
524 liter18.5 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -1493 liter-52.7 cu ft (-74.0%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
🟒 +675 kg+1488 lbs (+58.1%) - 🟒 +853 kg+1881 lbs (+76.4%)
1116-1162 kg2460-2562 lbs
πŸ”΄ -853 kg-1881 lbs (-43.3%) - πŸ”΄ -675 kg-1488 lbs (-36.7%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

-
-

Roof Load:

-
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20
13-inch rims:
  • 6.5J x 13
14-inch rims:
  • 6J x 14

Tire Size:

  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 165/80 R13 (W:165 | H:80 | D:13)
  • 205/70 R14 (W:205 | H:70 | D:14)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car