2016 Mazda CX-9 II vs. 2005 Ford Fusion I
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2005 Ford Fusion I (facelift 2005)Change Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II and the 2005 Ford Fusion I compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II measures 5065 mm (199.41 in), making it 1052 mm (41.42 in) (20.8 %) longer than the 2005 Ford Fusion I at 4013 mm (157.99 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II spans 1969 mm (77.52 in), which is 245 mm (9.65 in) (12.4 %) broader than the 2005 Ford Fusion I at 1724 mm (67.87 in). As for height, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II stands at 1716 mm (67.56 in), giving it an extra 173 mm (6.81 in) (10.1 %) compared to the 2005 Ford Fusion I at 1543 mm (60.75 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer, wider and taller than the 2005 Ford Fusion I.

Length
5065 mm199.4 in
4013 mm158.0 in
Width
1969 mm77.5 in
1724 mm67.9 in
Height
1716 mm67.6 in
1543 mm60.7 in

2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +1052 mm+41.4 in (+26.2%)
2005 Ford Fusion I Preview
4013 mm158.0 in πŸ”΄ -1052 mm-41.4 in (-20.8%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +245 mm+9.6 in (+14.2%)
2005 Ford Fusion I Preview
1724 mm67.9 in πŸ”΄ -245 mm-9.6 in (-12.4%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in 🟒 +173 mm+6.8 in (+11.2%)
2005 Ford Fusion I Preview
1543 mm60.7 in πŸ”΄ -173 mm-6.8 in (-10.1%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II
2005 Ford Fusion I

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
Hatchback

Model Year:

2016
2005

Production:

2016-2023 Discontinued Model
2005-2012 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +1052 mm+41.4 in (+26.2%)
4013 mm158.0 in
πŸ”΄ -1052 mm-41.4 in (-20.8%)

Width:

1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +245 mm+9.6 in (+14.2%)
1724 mm67.9 in
πŸ”΄ -245 mm-9.6 in (-12.4%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

2207 mm86.9 in
-

Height:

1716 mm67.6 in
🟒 +173 mm+6.8 in (+11.2%)
1543 mm60.7 in
πŸ”΄ -173 mm-6.8 in (-10.1%)

Ground Clearance:

216 mm8.5 in
🟒 +56 mm+2.2 in (+35.0%)
160 mm6.3 in
πŸ”΄ -56 mm-2.2 in (-25.9%)

Trunk Capacity:

407 liter14.4 cu ft
🟒 +70 liter+2.5 cu ft (+20.8%)
337 liter11.9 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -70 liter-2.5 cu ft (-17.2%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

2017 liter71.2 cu ft
🟒 +842 liter+29.7 cu ft (+71.7%)
1175 liter41.5 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -842 liter-29.7 cu ft (-41.7%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
🟒 +722 kg+1592 lbs (+64.8%) - 🟒 +894 kg+1971 lbs (+83.2%)
1075-1115 kg2370-2458 lbs
πŸ”΄ -894 kg-1971 lbs (-45.4%) - πŸ”΄ -722 kg-1592 lbs (-39.3%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

-
1605-1675 kg3538-3693 lbs

Roof Load:

-
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20
  • 16 inches
  • 15 inches

Tire Size:

  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 195/55 R16 (W:195 | H:55 | D:16)
  • 195/60 R15 (W:195 | H:60 | D:15)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car