2016 Mazda CX-9 II vs. 2013 Audi Q5 I
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2013 Audi Q5 I (8R, facelift 2012)Change Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II and the 2013 Audi Q5 I compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II measures 5065 mm (199.41 in), making it 426 mm (16.77 in) (8.4 %) longer than the 2013 Audi Q5 I at 4639 mm (182.64 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II spans 1969 mm (77.52 in), which is 71 mm (2.80 in) (3.6 %) broader than the 2013 Audi Q5 I at 1898 mm (74.72 in). As for height, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II stands at 1716 mm (67.56 in), giving it an extra 61 mm (2.40 in) (3.6 %) compared to the 2013 Audi Q5 I at 1655 mm (65.16 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer, wider and taller than the 2013 Audi Q5 I.

Length
5065 mm199.4 in
4639 mm182.6 in
Width
1969 mm77.5 in
1898 mm74.7 in
Height
1716 mm67.6 in
1655 mm65.2 in

2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +426 mm+16.8 in (+9.2%)
2013 Audi Q5 I Side View Left
4639 mm182.6 in πŸ”΄ -426 mm-16.8 in (-8.4%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +71 mm+2.8 in (+3.7%)
2013 Audi Q5 I Front View
1898 mm74.7 in πŸ”΄ -71 mm-2.8 in (-3.6%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in 🟒 +61 mm+2.4 in (+3.7%)
2013 Audi Q5 I Rear View
1655 mm65.2 in πŸ”΄ -61 mm-2.4 in (-3.6%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II
2013 Audi Q5 I

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2016
2013

Production:

2016-2023 Discontinued Model
2012-2017 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +426 mm+16.8 in (+9.2%) - 🟒 +436 mm+17.2 in (+9.4%)
4629-4639 mm182.2-182.6 in
πŸ”΄ -436 mm-17.2 in (-8.6%) - πŸ”΄ -426 mm-16.8 in (-8.4%)

Width:

1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +71 mm+2.8 in (+3.7%)
1898 mm74.7 in
πŸ”΄ -71 mm-2.8 in (-3.6%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

2207 mm86.9 in
🟒 +118 mm+4.6 in (+5.6%)
2089 mm82.2 in
πŸ”΄ -118 mm-4.6 in (-5.3%)

Height:

1716 mm67.6 in
🟒 +61 mm+2.4 in (+3.7%)
1655 mm65.2 in
πŸ”΄ -61 mm-2.4 in (-3.6%)

Ground Clearance:

216 mm8.5 in
🟒 +16 mm+0.6 in (+8.0%)
200 mm7.9 in
πŸ”΄ -16 mm-0.6 in (-7.4%)

Trunk Capacity:

407 liter14.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -133 liter-4.7 cu ft (-24.6%)
540 liter19.1 cu ft
🟒 +133 liter+4.7 cu ft (+32.7%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

2017 liter71.2 cu ft
🟒 +457 liter+16.1 cu ft (+29.3%)
1560 liter55.1 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -457 liter-16.1 cu ft (-22.7%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
πŸ”΄ -193 kg-425 lbs (-9.5%) - 🟒 +289 kg+637 lbs (+17.2%)
1680-2030 kg3704-4475 lbs
πŸ”΄ -289 kg-637 lbs (-14.7%) - 🟒 +193 kg+425 lbs (+10.5%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

-
2260-2490 kg4982-5490 lbs

Roof Load:

-
75 kg165 lbs

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20
17-inch rims:
  • 8J x 17
18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
19-inch rims:
  • 8J x 19
  • 19
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20
21-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 21

Tire Size:

  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 235/55 R19 (W:235 | H:55 | D:19)
  • 235/60 R18 (W:235 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 235/65 R17 (W:235 | H:65 | D:17)
  • 235/65 R 17 (W:235 | H:65 | D:17)
  • 255/40 R21 (W:255 | H:40 | D:21)
  • 255/45 R20 (W:255 | H:45 | D:20)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car