2016 Mazda CX-9 II vs. 2011 Dodge Durango III
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2011 Dodge Durango III (WD)Change Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II and the 2011 Dodge Durango III compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2011 Dodge Durango III comes in at 5075 mm (199.80 in), giving it a 10 mm (0.39 in) (0.2 %) advantage over the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II at 5065 mm (199.41 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II spans 1969 mm (77.52 in), which is 44 mm (1.73 in) (2.2 %) broader than the 2011 Dodge Durango III at 1925 mm (75.79 in). As for height, the 2011 Dodge Durango III reaches 1801 mm (70.91 in), which is 85 mm (3.35 in) (4.7 %) taller than the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II at 1716 mm (67.56 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is wider than the 2011 Dodge Durango III, while the 2011 Dodge Durango III is longer and taller than the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II.

Length
5065 mm199.4 in
5075 mm199.8 in
Width
1969 mm77.5 in
1925 mm75.8 in
Height
1716 mm67.6 in
1801 mm70.9 in

2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in πŸ”΄ -10 mm-0.4 in (-0.2%)
2011 Dodge Durango III Side View Left
5075 mm199.8 in 🟒 +10 mm+0.4 in (+0.2%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +44 mm+1.7 in (+2.3%)
2011 Dodge Durango III Front View
1925 mm75.8 in πŸ”΄ -44 mm-1.7 in (-2.2%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in πŸ”΄ -85 mm-3.3 in (-4.7%)
2011 Dodge Durango III Rear View
1801 mm70.9 in 🟒 +85 mm+3.3 in (+5.0%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II
2011 Dodge Durango III

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2016
2011

Production:

2016-2023 Discontinued Model
2010-2014 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

5065 mm199.4 in
πŸ”΄ -10 mm-0.4 in (-0.2%)
5075 mm199.8 in
🟒 +10 mm+0.4 in (+0.2%)

Width:

1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +44 mm+1.7 in (+2.3%)
1925 mm75.8 in
πŸ”΄ -44 mm-1.7 in (-2.2%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

2207 mm86.9 in
🟒 +35 mm+1.4 in (+1.6%)
2172 mm85.5 in
πŸ”΄ -35 mm-1.4 in (-1.6%)

Height:

1716 mm67.6 in
πŸ”΄ -85 mm-3.3 in (-4.7%)
1801 mm70.9 in
🟒 +85 mm+3.3 in (+5.0%)

Ground Clearance:

216 mm8.5 in
🟒 +9 mm+0.4 in (+4.3%)
207 mm8.1 in
πŸ”΄ -9 mm-0.4 in (-4.2%)

Trunk Capacity:

407 liter14.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -83 liter-2.9 cu ft (-16.9%)
490 liter17.3 cu ft
🟒 +83 liter+2.9 cu ft (+20.4%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

2017 liter71.2 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -373 liter-13.2 cu ft (-15.6%)
2390 liter84.4 cu ft
🟒 +373 liter+13.2 cu ft (+18.5%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
πŸ”΄ -581 kg-1281 lbs (-24.0%) - πŸ”΄ -188 kg-414 lbs (-8.7%)
2157-2418 kg4755-5331 lbs
🟒 +188 kg+414 lbs (+9.5%) - 🟒 +581 kg+1281 lbs (+31.6%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

-
2948-3221 kg6499-7101 lbs

Roof Load:

-
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20
  • 18 inches
  • 20 inches

Tire Size:

  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 265/50 R20 (W:265 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 265/60 R18 (W:265 | H:60 | D:18)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car