2012 Renault Clio IV vs. 2016 Fiat Tipo
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2012 Renault Clio IV (Phase I)Change Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2016 Fiat Tipo (356)Change Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2012 Renault Clio IV and the 2016 Fiat Tipo compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Fiat Tipo comes in at 4532 mm (178.43 in), giving it a 470 mm (18.50 in) (10.4 %) advantage over the 2012 Renault Clio IV at 4062 mm (159.92 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Fiat Tipo stretches to 1792 mm (70.55 in), making it 15 mm (0.59 in) (0.8 %) wider than the 2012 Renault Clio IV at 1777 mm (69.96 in). As for height, the 2016 Fiat Tipo reaches 1497 mm (58.94 in), which is 49 mm (1.93 in) (3.3 %) taller than the 2012 Renault Clio IV at 1448 mm (57.01 in).

Overall, the 2016 Fiat Tipo is longer, wider and taller than the 2012 Renault Clio IV.

Length
4062 mm159.9 in
4532 mm178.4 in
Width
1777 mm70.0 in
1792 mm70.6 in
Height
1448 mm57.0 in
1497 mm58.9 in

2012 Renault Clio IV Preview
4062 mm159.9 in πŸ”΄ -470 mm-18.5 in (-10.4%)
2016 Fiat Tipo Preview
4532 mm178.4 in 🟒 +470 mm+18.5 in (+11.6%)
2012 Renault Clio IV Front View
1777 mm70.0 in πŸ”΄ -15 mm-0.6 in (-0.8%)
2016 Fiat Tipo Front View
1792 mm70.6 in 🟒 +15 mm+0.6 in (+0.8%)
2012 Renault Clio IV Front View
1448 mm57.0 in πŸ”΄ -49 mm-1.9 in (-3.3%)
2016 Fiat Tipo Front View
1497 mm58.9 in 🟒 +49 mm+1.9 in (+3.4%)
2012 Renault Clio IV
2016 Fiat Tipo

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

Hatchback
Sedan

Model Year:

2012
2016

Production:

2012-2016 Discontinued Model
2015-2020 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4062 mm159.9 in
πŸ”΄ -470 mm-18.5 in (-10.4%)
4532 mm178.4 in
🟒 +470 mm+18.5 in (+11.6%)

Width:

1732-1777 mm68.2-70.0 in
πŸ”΄ -60 mm-2.4 in (-3.3%) - πŸ”΄ -15 mm-0.6 in (-0.8%)
1792 mm70.6 in
🟒 +15 mm+0.6 in (+0.8%) - 🟒 +60 mm+2.4 in (+3.5%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

1945 mm76.6 in
-

Height:

1448 mm57.0 in
πŸ”΄ -49 mm-1.9 in (-3.3%)
1497 mm58.9 in
🟒 +49 mm+1.9 in (+3.4%)

Ground Clearance:

120 mm4.7 in
-

Trunk Capacity:

300 liter10.6 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -220 liter-7.8 cu ft (-42.3%)
520 liter18.4 cu ft
🟒 +220 liter+7.8 cu ft (+73.3%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

1146 liter40.5 cu ft
-

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

980-1204 kg2161-2654 lbs
πŸ”΄ -330 kg-728 lbs (-25.2%) - 🟒 +54 kg+119 lbs (+4.7%)
1150-1310 kg2535-2888 lbs
πŸ”΄ -54 kg-119 lbs (-4.5%) - 🟒 +330 kg+728 lbs (+33.7%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

1563-1658 kg3446-3655 lbs
πŸ”΄ -247 kg-545 lbs (-13.6%) - 🟒 +8 kg+18 lbs (+0.5%)
1650-1810 kg3638-3990 lbs
πŸ”΄ -8 kg-18 lbs (-0.5%) - 🟒 +247 kg+545 lbs (+15.8%)

Roof Load:

80 kg176 lbs
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

  • 15 inches
  • 16 inches
  • 17 inches
  • 16 inches
  • 15 inches
  • 17 inches

Tire Size:

  • 185/65 R15 88T (W:185 | H:65 | D:15)
  • 185/65 R15 (W:185 | H:65 | D:15)
  • 185/65 R15 88t (W:185 | H:65 | D:15)
  • 195/55 R16 87H (W:195 | H:55 | D:16)
  • 195/55 R16 (W:195 | H:55 | D:16)
  • 205/45 R17 (W:205 | H:45 | D:17)
  • 195/65 R15 (W:195 | H:65 | D:15)
  • 205/55 R16 (W:205 | H:55 | D:16)
  • 225/45 R17 (W:225 | H:45 | D:17)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car