2003 BMW X3 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail II
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2003 BMW X3 (E83)Change Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2010 Nissan X-Trail II (T31, facelift 2010)Change Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2003 BMW X3 and the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II comes in at 4635 mm (182.48 in), giving it a 66 mm (2.60 in) (1.4 %) advantage over the 2003 BMW X3 at 4569 mm (179.88 in). Looking at width, the 2003 BMW X3 spans 1853 mm (72.95 in), which is 63 mm (2.48 in) (3.4 %) broader than the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II at 1790 mm (70.47 in). As for height, the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II reaches 1700 mm (66.93 in), which is 26 mm (1.02 in) (1.5 %) taller than the 2003 BMW X3 at 1674 mm (65.91 in).

Overall, the 2003 BMW X3 is wider than the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II, while the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II is longer and taller than the 2003 BMW X3.

Length
4569 mm179.9 in
4635 mm182.5 in
Width
1853 mm73.0 in
1790 mm70.5 in
Height
1674 mm65.9 in
1700 mm66.9 in

2003 BMW X3 Side View Left
4569 mm179.9 in πŸ”΄ -66 mm-2.6 in (-1.4%)
2010 Nissan X-Trail II Preview
4635 mm182.5 in 🟒 +66 mm+2.6 in (+1.4%)
2003 BMW X3 Front View
1853 mm73.0 in 🟒 +63 mm+2.5 in (+3.5%)
2010 Nissan X-Trail II Preview
1790 mm70.5 in πŸ”΄ -63 mm-2.5 in (-3.4%)
2003 BMW X3 Rear View
1674 mm65.9 in πŸ”΄ -26 mm-1.0 in (-1.5%)
2010 Nissan X-Trail II Preview
1700 mm66.9 in 🟒 +26 mm+1.0 in (+1.6%)
2003 BMW X3
2010 Nissan X-Trail II

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2003
2010

Production:

2003-2006 Discontinued Model
2010-2014 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4569 mm179.9 in
πŸ”΄ -66 mm-2.6 in (-1.4%)
4635 mm182.5 in
🟒 +66 mm+2.6 in (+1.4%)

Width:

1853 mm73.0 in
🟒 +63 mm+2.5 in (+3.5%)
1790 mm70.5 in
πŸ”΄ -63 mm-2.5 in (-3.4%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

-
-

Height:

1674 mm65.9 in
πŸ”΄ -26 mm-1.0 in (-1.5%)
1700 mm66.9 in
🟒 +26 mm+1.0 in (+1.6%)

Ground Clearance:

200 mm7.9 in
πŸ”΄ -10 mm-0.4 in (-4.8%)
210 mm8.3 in
🟒 +10 mm+0.4 in (+5.0%)

Trunk Capacity:

500 liter17.7 cu ft
🟒 +21 liter+0.7 cu ft (+4.4%)
479 liter16.9 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -21 liter-0.7 cu ft (-4.2%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

1560 liter55.1 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -213 liter-7.5 cu ft (-12.0%)
1773 liter62.6 cu ft
🟒 +213 liter+7.5 cu ft (+13.7%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1660-1925 kg3660-4244 lbs
🟒 +15 kg+33 lbs (+0.9%) - 🟒 +320 kg+705 lbs (+19.9%)
1605-1645 kg3538-3627 lbs
πŸ”΄ -320 kg-705 lbs (-16.6%) - πŸ”΄ -15 kg-33 lbs (-0.9%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

2200-2355 kg4850-5192 lbs
🟒 +30 kg+66 lbs (+1.4%) - 🟒 +185 kg+408 lbs (+8.5%)
2170 kg4784 lbs
πŸ”΄ -185 kg-408 lbs (-7.9%) - πŸ”΄ -30 kg-66 lbs (-1.4%)

Roof Load:

-
100 kg220 lbs

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

17-inch rims:
  • 8.0J x 17
  • 17
  • 8.0 J X 17
17-inch rims:
  • 7J x 17
18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18

Tire Size:

  • 235/55 R17 (W:235 | H:55 | D:17)
  • 225/55 R18 (W:225 | H:55 | D:18)
  • 225/60 R17 (W:225 | H:60 | D:17)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car