Compare Dimensions
2017 BMW X3 vs. 2014 Nissan Rogue II

Here’s how 2017 BMW X3 and 2014 Nissan Rogue II compare in size: 2017 BMW X3 is longer than 2014 Nissan Rogue II, offering more overall body length. 2017 BMW X3 is wider than 2014 Nissan Rogue II, which may translate to more cabin space or road presence. 2014 Nissan Rogue II is taller than 2017 BMW X3, adding extra vertical space.

Length
4727 mm186.1 in
4630 mm182.3 in
Width
1897 mm74.7 in
1839 mm72.4 in
Height
1676 mm66.0 in
1684 mm66.3 in

2017 BMW X3 Side View Left
4727 mm186.1 in 🟒 +97 mm+3.8 in (+2.1%)
2014 Nissan Rogue II Side View Left
4630 mm182.3 in πŸ”΄ -97 mm-3.8 in (-2.1%)
2017 BMW X3 Front View
1897 mm74.7 in 🟒 +58 mm+2.3 in (+3.2%)
2014 Nissan Rogue II Front View
1839 mm72.4 in πŸ”΄ -58 mm-2.3 in (-3.1%)
2017 BMW X3 Rear View
1676 mm66.0 in πŸ”΄ -8 mm-0.3 in (-0.5%)
2014 Nissan Rogue II Rear View
1684 mm66.3 in 🟒 +8 mm+0.3 in (+0.5%)
2017 BMW X3
2014 Nissan Rogue II

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2017
2014

Production:

2017-2021 Discontinued Model
2013-2016 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4708-4727 mm185.4-186.1 in
🟒 +78 mm+3.1 in (+1.7%) - 🟒 +97 mm+3.8 in (+2.1%)
4630 mm182.3 in
πŸ”΄ -97 mm-3.8 in (-2.1%) - πŸ”΄ -78 mm-3.1 in (-1.7%)

Width:

1891-1897 mm74.4-74.7 in
🟒 +52 mm+2.0 in (+2.8%) - 🟒 +58 mm+2.3 in (+3.2%)
1839 mm72.4 in
πŸ”΄ -58 mm-2.3 in (-3.1%) - πŸ”΄ -52 mm-2.0 in (-2.7%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

2139 mm84.2 in
-

Height:

1676 mm66.0 in
πŸ”΄ -8 mm-0.3 in (-0.5%)
1684 mm66.3 in
🟒 +8 mm+0.3 in (+0.5%)

Ground Clearance:

204 mm8.0 in
🟒 +11 mm+0.4 in (+5.7%) - 🟒 +16 mm+0.6 in (+8.5%)
188-193 mm7.4-7.6 in
πŸ”΄ -16 mm-0.6 in (-7.8%) - πŸ”΄ -11 mm-0.4 in (-5.4%)

Trunk Capacity:

450-550 liter15.9-19.4 cu ft
🟒 +184 liter+6.5 cu ft (+69.2%) - 🟒 +284 liter+10.0 cu ft (+106.8%)
266 liter9.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -284 liter-10.0 cu ft (-51.6%) - πŸ”΄ -184 liter-6.5 cu ft (-40.9%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

1500-1600 liter53.0-56.5 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -482 liter-17.0 cu ft (-24.3%) - πŸ”΄ -382 liter-13.5 cu ft (-19.3%)
1982 liter70.0 cu ft
🟒 +382 liter+13.5 cu ft (+23.9%) - 🟒 +482 liter+17.0 cu ft (+32.1%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1685-2020 kg3715-4453 lbs
🟒 +83 kg+183 lbs (+5.2%) - 🟒 +481 kg+1060 lbs (+31.3%)
1539-1602 kg3393-3532 lbs
πŸ”΄ -481 kg-1060 lbs (-23.8%) - πŸ”΄ -83 kg-183 lbs (-4.9%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

2360-2620 kg5203-5776 lbs
🟒 +238 kg+525 lbs (+11.2%) - 🟒 +584 kg+1287 lbs (+28.7%)
2036-2122 kg4489-4678 lbs
πŸ”΄ -584 kg-1287 lbs (-22.3%) - πŸ”΄ -238 kg-525 lbs (-10.1%)

Roof Load:

100 kg220 lbs
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

18-inch rims:
  • 7.0J x 18
  • 7J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.0J x 20
  • 9.5J x 20
  • 8J x 20
19-inch rims:
  • 7.5J x 19
17-inch rims:
  • 7.0J x 17

Tire Size:

  • 225/60 R18 104W (W:225 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 225/60 R18 (W:225 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 225/60 R18 104W XL (W:225 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 245/45 R20 103W (W:245 | H:45 | D:20)
  • 245/45 R20 (W:245 | H:45 | D:20)
  • 245/45 R20 103W XL (W:245 | H:45 | D:20)
  • 245/50 R19 (W:245 | H:50 | D:19)
  • 275/40 R20 106W (W:275 | H:40 | D:20)
  • 275/40 R20 (W:275 | H:40 | D:20)
  • 275/40 R20 106W XL (W:275 | H:40 | D:20)
  • 225/60 R17 106H (W:225 | H:60 | D:17)

Related Comparisons

Quickly compare the size of two vehicles by entering their names in the respective input fields. Hit Compare to view their dimensions head-to-head. Feeling adventurous? Click the Random button for a surprise comparison.

      Small red car