2009 Nissan Pixo vs. 2016 Mitsubishi Space Star
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2009 Nissan PixoChange Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2016 Mitsubishi Space Star (facelift 2015)Change Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2009 Nissan Pixo and the 2016 Mitsubishi Space Star compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mitsubishi Space Star comes in at 3795 mm (149.41 in), giving it a 230 mm (9.06 in) (6.1 %) advantage over the 2009 Nissan Pixo at 3565 mm (140.35 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mitsubishi Space Star stretches to 1665 mm (65.55 in), making it 65 mm (2.56 in) (3.9 %) wider than the 2009 Nissan Pixo at 1600 mm (62.99 in). As for height, the 2016 Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 1505 mm (59.25 in), which is 35 mm (1.38 in) (2.3 %) taller than the 2009 Nissan Pixo at 1470 mm (57.87 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mitsubishi Space Star is longer, wider and taller than the 2009 Nissan Pixo.

Length
3565 mm140.4 in
3795 mm149.4 in
Width
1600 mm63.0 in
1665 mm65.6 in
Height
1470 mm57.9 in
1505 mm59.3 in

2009 Nissan Pixo Preview
3565 mm140.4 in πŸ”΄ -230 mm-9.1 in (-6.1%)
2016 Mitsubishi Space Star Preview
3795 mm149.4 in 🟒 +230 mm+9.1 in (+6.5%)
2009 Nissan Pixo Preview
1600 mm63.0 in πŸ”΄ -65 mm-2.6 in (-3.9%)
2016 Mitsubishi Space Star Front View
1665 mm65.6 in 🟒 +65 mm+2.6 in (+4.1%)
2009 Nissan Pixo Preview
1470 mm57.9 in πŸ”΄ -35 mm-1.4 in (-2.3%)
2016 Mitsubishi Space Star Front View
1505 mm59.3 in 🟒 +35 mm+1.4 in (+2.4%)
2009 Nissan Pixo
2016 Mitsubishi Space Star

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

Hatchback
Hatchback

Model Year:

2009
2016

Production:

2009-2013 Discontinued Model
2015-2019 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

3565 mm140.4 in
πŸ”΄ -230 mm-9.1 in (-6.1%)
3795 mm149.4 in
🟒 +230 mm+9.1 in (+6.5%)

Width:

1600 mm63.0 in
πŸ”΄ -65 mm-2.6 in (-3.9%)
1665 mm65.6 in
🟒 +65 mm+2.6 in (+4.1%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

-
1950 mm76.8 in

Height:

1470 mm57.9 in
πŸ”΄ -35 mm-1.4 in (-2.3%)
1505 mm59.3 in
🟒 +35 mm+1.4 in (+2.4%)

Ground Clearance:

-
150 mm5.9 in

Trunk Capacity:

129 liter4.6 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -106 liter-3.7 cu ft (-45.1%) - πŸ”΄ -80 liter-2.8 cu ft (-38.3%)
209-235 liter7.4-8.3 cu ft
🟒 +80 liter+2.8 cu ft (+62.0%) - 🟒 +106 liter+3.7 cu ft (+82.2%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

367 liter13.0 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -545 liter-19.2 cu ft (-59.8%)
912 liter32.2 cu ft
🟒 +545 liter+19.2 cu ft (+148.5%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

885-910 kg1951-2006 lbs
🟒 +15 kg+33 lbs (+1.7%) - 🟒 +65 kg+143 lbs (+7.7%)
845-870 kg1863-1918 lbs
πŸ”΄ -65 kg-143 lbs (-7.1%) - πŸ”΄ -15 kg-33 lbs (-1.7%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

1250 kg2756 lbs
πŸ”΄ -120 kg-265 lbs (-8.8%) - πŸ”΄ -40 kg-88 lbs (-3.1%)
1290-1370 kg2844-3020 lbs
🟒 +40 kg+88 lbs (+3.2%) - 🟒 +120 kg+265 lbs (+9.6%)

Roof Load:

35 kg77 lbs
πŸ”΄ -15 kg-33 lbs (-30.0%)
50 kg110 lbs
🟒 +15 kg+33 lbs (+42.9%)

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

14-inch rims:
  • 4J x 14
14-inch rims:
  • 4.5J x 14
15-inch rims:
  • 5.0J x 15

Tire Size:

  • 55/65 R14 (W:55 | H:65 | D:14)
  • 165/65 R14 (W:165 | H:65 | D:14)
  • 175/55 R15 (W:175 | H:55 | D:15)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car