2010 Nissan X-Trail II vs 2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport III
Compare Dimensions Side by Side 2010 Nissan X-Trail II vs. 2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport III
Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.
Here’s how the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II and the 2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport III compare in size:
In terms of length, the 2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport III comes in at 4785 mm (188.39 in), giving it a 150 mm (5.91 in) (3.1 %) advantage over the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II at 4635 mm (182.48 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport III stretches to 1815 mm (71.46 in), making it 25 mm (0.98 in) (1.4 %) wider than the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II at 1790 mm (70.47 in). As for height, the 2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport III reaches 1800 mm (70.87 in), which is 100 mm (3.94 in) (5.6 %) taller than the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II at 1700 mm (66.93 in).
Overall, the 2016 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport III is longer, wider and taller than the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II.
