2010 Nissan X-Trail II vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2010 Nissan X-Trail II (T31, facelift 2010)Change Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2013 Mazda CX-5Change Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II and the 2013 Mazda CX-5 compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II measures 4635 mm (182.48 in), making it 80 mm (3.15 in) (1.7 %) longer than the 2013 Mazda CX-5 at 4555 mm (179.33 in). Looking at width, the 2013 Mazda CX-5 stretches to 1840 mm (72.44 in), making it 50 mm (1.97 in) (2.7 %) wider than the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II at 1790 mm (70.47 in). As for height, the 2013 Mazda CX-5 reaches 1710 mm (67.32 in), which is 10 mm (0.39 in) (0.6 %) taller than the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II at 1700 mm (66.93 in).

Overall, the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II is longer than the 2013 Mazda CX-5, while the 2013 Mazda CX-5 is wider and taller than the 2010 Nissan X-Trail II.

Length
4635 mm182.5 in
4555 mm179.3 in
Width
1790 mm70.5 in
1840 mm72.4 in
Height
1700 mm66.9 in
1710 mm67.3 in

2010 Nissan X-Trail II Preview
4635 mm182.5 in 🟒 +80 mm+3.1 in (+1.8%)
2013 Mazda CX-5 Side View Left
4555 mm179.3 in πŸ”΄ -80 mm-3.1 in (-1.7%)
2010 Nissan X-Trail II Preview
1790 mm70.5 in πŸ”΄ -50 mm-2.0 in (-2.7%)
2013 Mazda CX-5 Front View
1840 mm72.4 in 🟒 +50 mm+2.0 in (+2.8%)
2010 Nissan X-Trail II Preview
1700 mm66.9 in πŸ”΄ -10 mm-0.4 in (-0.6%)
2013 Mazda CX-5 Rear View
1710 mm67.3 in 🟒 +10 mm+0.4 in (+0.6%)
2010 Nissan X-Trail II
2013 Mazda CX-5

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2010
2013

Production:

2010-2014 Discontinued Model
2012-2015 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4635 mm182.5 in
🟒 +80 mm+3.1 in (+1.8%)
4555 mm179.3 in
πŸ”΄ -80 mm-3.1 in (-1.7%)

Width:

1790 mm70.5 in
πŸ”΄ -50 mm-2.0 in (-2.7%)
1840 mm72.4 in
🟒 +50 mm+2.0 in (+2.8%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

-
-

Height:

1700 mm66.9 in
πŸ”΄ -10 mm-0.4 in (-0.6%)
1710 mm67.3 in
🟒 +10 mm+0.4 in (+0.6%)

Ground Clearance:

210 mm8.3 in
πŸ”΄ -5 mm-0.2 in (-2.3%)
210-215 mm8.3-8.5 in
🟒 +5 mm+0.2 in (+2.4%)

Trunk Capacity:

479 liter16.9 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -24 liter-0.8 cu ft (-4.8%)
503 liter17.8 cu ft
🟒 +24 liter+0.8 cu ft (+5.0%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

1773 liter62.6 cu ft
🟒 +153 liter+5.4 cu ft (+9.4%)
1620 liter57.2 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -153 liter-5.4 cu ft (-8.6%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1605-1645 kg3538-3627 lbs
🟒 +3 kg+7 lbs (+0.2%) - 🟒 +330 kg+728 lbs (+25.1%)
1315-1602 kg2899-3532 lbs
πŸ”΄ -330 kg-728 lbs (-20.1%) - πŸ”΄ -3 kg-7 lbs (-0.2%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

2170 kg4784 lbs
🟒 +50 kg+110 lbs (+2.4%) - 🟒 +240 kg+529 lbs (+12.4%)
1930-2120 kg4255-4674 lbs
πŸ”΄ -240 kg-529 lbs (-11.1%) - πŸ”΄ -50 kg-110 lbs (-2.3%)

Roof Load:

100 kg220 lbs
🟒 +50 kg+110 lbs (+100.0%)
50 kg110 lbs
πŸ”΄ -50 kg-110 lbs (-50.0%)

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

17-inch rims:
  • 7J x 17
18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
17-inch rims:
  • 7J x 17
19-inch rims:
  • 7J x 19

Tire Size:

  • 225/55 R18 (W:225 | H:55 | D:18)
  • 225/60 R17 (W:225 | H:60 | D:17)
  • 225/55 R17 (W:225 | H:55 | D:17)
  • 225/55 R19 (W:225 | H:55 | D:19)
  • 225/65 R17 (W:225 | H:65 | D:17)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car