2011 Ford Edge I vs. 2016 Mazda CX-9 II
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2011 Ford Edge I (facelift 2011)Change Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2011 Ford Edge I and the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II comes in at 5065 mm (199.41 in), giving it a 386 mm (15.20 in) (7.6 %) advantage over the 2011 Ford Edge I at 4679 mm (184.21 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II stretches to 1969 mm (77.52 in), making it 39 mm (1.54 in) (2.0 %) wider than the 2011 Ford Edge I at 1930 mm (75.98 in). As for height, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II reaches 1716 mm (67.56 in), which is 14 mm (0.55 in) (0.8 %) taller than the 2011 Ford Edge I at 1702 mm (67.01 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer, wider and taller than the 2011 Ford Edge I.

Length
4679 mm184.2 in
5065 mm199.4 in
Width
1930 mm76.0 in
1969 mm77.5 in
Height
1702 mm67.0 in
1716 mm67.6 in

2011 Ford Edge I Side View Left
4679 mm184.2 in πŸ”΄ -386 mm-15.2 in (-7.6%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +386 mm+15.2 in (+8.2%)
2011 Ford Edge I Front View
1930 mm76.0 in πŸ”΄ -39 mm-1.5 in (-2.0%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +39 mm+1.5 in (+2.0%)
2011 Ford Edge I Rear View
1702 mm67.0 in πŸ”΄ -14 mm-0.6 in (-0.8%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in 🟒 +14 mm+0.6 in (+0.8%)
2011 Ford Edge I
2016 Mazda CX-9 II

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2011
2016

Production:

2011-2014 Discontinued Model
2016-2023 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4679 mm184.2 in
πŸ”΄ -386 mm-15.2 in (-7.6%)
5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +386 mm+15.2 in (+8.2%)

Width:

1930 mm76.0 in
πŸ”΄ -39 mm-1.5 in (-2.0%)
1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +39 mm+1.5 in (+2.0%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

-
2207 mm86.9 in

Height:

1702 mm67.0 in
πŸ”΄ -14 mm-0.6 in (-0.8%)
1716 mm67.6 in
🟒 +14 mm+0.6 in (+0.8%)

Ground Clearance:

200 mm7.9 in
πŸ”΄ -16 mm-0.6 in (-7.4%)
216 mm8.5 in
🟒 +16 mm+0.6 in (+8.0%)

Trunk Capacity:

911 liter32.2 cu ft
🟒 +504 liter+17.8 cu ft (+123.8%)
407 liter14.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -504 liter-17.8 cu ft (-55.3%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

1980 liter69.9 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -37 liter-1.3 cu ft (-1.8%)
2017 liter71.2 cu ft
🟒 +37 liter+1.3 cu ft (+1.9%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1813-1935 kg3997-4266 lbs
πŸ”΄ -156 kg-344 lbs (-7.9%) - 🟒 +98 kg+216 lbs (+5.3%)
1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
πŸ”΄ -98 kg-216 lbs (-5.1%) - 🟒 +156 kg+344 lbs (+8.6%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

2226-2347 kg4907-5174 lbs
-

Roof Load:

-
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

17-inch rims:
  • 7.5J x 17
18-inch rims:
  • 7.5J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 7.5J x 20
18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20

Tire Size:

  • 235/65 R17 (W:235 | H:65 | D:17)
  • 245/50 R20 (W:245 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 245/60 R18 (W:245 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car