1965 Ford Mustang I vs. 2016 Mazda CX-9 II
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
1965 Ford Mustang IChange Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 1965 Ford Mustang I and the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II comes in at 5065 mm (199.41 in), giving it a 452 mm (17.80 in) (8.9 %) advantage over the 1965 Ford Mustang I at 4613 mm (181.61 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II stretches to 1969 mm (77.52 in), making it 237 mm (9.33 in) (12.0 %) wider than the 1965 Ford Mustang I at 1732 mm (68.19 in). As for height, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II reaches 1716 mm (67.56 in), which is 418 mm (16.46 in) (24.4 %) taller than the 1965 Ford Mustang I at 1298 mm (51.10 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer, wider and taller than the 1965 Ford Mustang I.

Length
4613 mm181.6 in
5065 mm199.4 in
Width
1732 mm68.2 in
1969 mm77.5 in
Height
1298 mm51.1 in
1716 mm67.6 in

1965 Ford Mustang I Preview
4613 mm181.6 in πŸ”΄ -452 mm-17.8 in (-8.9%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +452 mm+17.8 in (+9.8%)
1965 Ford Mustang I Rear View
1732 mm68.2 in πŸ”΄ -237 mm-9.3 in (-12.0%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +237 mm+9.3 in (+13.7%)
1965 Ford Mustang I Rear View
1298 mm51.1 in πŸ”΄ -418 mm-16.5 in (-24.4%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in 🟒 +418 mm+16.5 in (+32.2%)
1965 Ford Mustang I
2016 Mazda CX-9 II

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

Coupe
SUV

Model Year:

1965
2016

Production:

1964-1967 Discontinued Model
2016-2023 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4613 mm181.6 in
πŸ”΄ -452 mm-17.8 in (-8.9%)
5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +452 mm+17.8 in (+9.8%)

Width:

1732 mm68.2 in
πŸ”΄ -237 mm-9.3 in (-12.0%)
1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +237 mm+9.3 in (+13.7%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

-
2207 mm86.9 in

Height:

1298 mm51.1 in
πŸ”΄ -418 mm-16.5 in (-24.4%)
1716 mm67.6 in
🟒 +418 mm+16.5 in (+32.2%)

Ground Clearance:

-
216 mm8.5 in

Trunk Capacity:

241 liter8.5 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -166 liter-5.9 cu ft (-40.8%)
407 liter14.4 cu ft
🟒 +166 liter+5.9 cu ft (+68.9%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

524 liter18.5 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -1493 liter-52.7 cu ft (-74.0%)
2017 liter71.2 cu ft
🟒 +1493 liter+52.7 cu ft (+284.9%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1116-1162 kg2460-2562 lbs
πŸ”΄ -853 kg-1881 lbs (-43.3%) - πŸ”΄ -675 kg-1488 lbs (-36.7%)
1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
🟒 +675 kg+1488 lbs (+58.1%) - 🟒 +853 kg+1881 lbs (+76.4%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

-
-

Roof Load:

-
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

13-inch rims:
  • 6.5J x 13
14-inch rims:
  • 6J x 14
18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20

Tire Size:

  • 165/80 R13 (W:165 | H:80 | D:13)
  • 205/70 R14 (W:205 | H:70 | D:14)
  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car