Compare Dimensions
2014 Nissan Rogue II vs. 2017 BMW X3

Here’s how 2014 Nissan Rogue II and 2017 BMW X3 compare in size: 2017 BMW X3 is longer than 2014 Nissan Rogue II, providing extra length. 2017 BMW X3 is wider than 2014 Nissan Rogue II, giving it a broader stance. 2014 Nissan Rogue II is taller than 2017 BMW X3, which could improve headroom or visibility.

Length
4630 mm182.3 in
4727 mm186.1 in
Width
1839 mm72.4 in
1897 mm74.7 in
Height
1684 mm66.3 in
1676 mm66.0 in

2014 Nissan Rogue II Side View Left
4630 mm182.3 in πŸ”΄ -97 mm-3.8 in (-2.1%)
2017 BMW X3 Side View Left
4727 mm186.1 in 🟒 +97 mm+3.8 in (+2.1%)
2014 Nissan Rogue II Front View
1839 mm72.4 in πŸ”΄ -58 mm-2.3 in (-3.1%)
2017 BMW X3 Front View
1897 mm74.7 in 🟒 +58 mm+2.3 in (+3.2%)
2014 Nissan Rogue II Rear View
1684 mm66.3 in 🟒 +8 mm+0.3 in (+0.5%)
2017 BMW X3 Rear View
1676 mm66.0 in πŸ”΄ -8 mm-0.3 in (-0.5%)
2014 Nissan Rogue II
2017 BMW X3

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2014
2017

Production:

2013-2016 Discontinued Model
2017-2021 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4630 mm182.3 in
πŸ”΄ -97 mm-3.8 in (-2.1%) - πŸ”΄ -78 mm-3.1 in (-1.7%)
4708-4727 mm185.4-186.1 in
🟒 +78 mm+3.1 in (+1.7%) - 🟒 +97 mm+3.8 in (+2.1%)

Width:

1839 mm72.4 in
πŸ”΄ -58 mm-2.3 in (-3.1%) - πŸ”΄ -52 mm-2.0 in (-2.7%)
1891-1897 mm74.4-74.7 in
🟒 +52 mm+2.0 in (+2.8%) - 🟒 +58 mm+2.3 in (+3.2%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

-
2139 mm84.2 in

Height:

1684 mm66.3 in
🟒 +8 mm+0.3 in (+0.5%)
1676 mm66.0 in
πŸ”΄ -8 mm-0.3 in (-0.5%)

Ground Clearance:

188-193 mm7.4-7.6 in
πŸ”΄ -16 mm-0.6 in (-7.8%) - πŸ”΄ -11 mm-0.4 in (-5.4%)
204 mm8.0 in
🟒 +11 mm+0.4 in (+5.7%) - 🟒 +16 mm+0.6 in (+8.5%)

Trunk Capacity:

266 liter9.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -284 liter-10.0 cu ft (-51.6%) - πŸ”΄ -184 liter-6.5 cu ft (-40.9%)
450-550 liter15.9-19.4 cu ft
🟒 +184 liter+6.5 cu ft (+69.2%) - 🟒 +284 liter+10.0 cu ft (+106.8%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

1982 liter70.0 cu ft
🟒 +382 liter+13.5 cu ft (+23.9%) - 🟒 +482 liter+17.0 cu ft (+32.1%)
1500-1600 liter53.0-56.5 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -482 liter-17.0 cu ft (-24.3%) - πŸ”΄ -382 liter-13.5 cu ft (-19.3%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1539-1602 kg3393-3532 lbs
πŸ”΄ -481 kg-1060 lbs (-23.8%) - πŸ”΄ -83 kg-183 lbs (-4.9%)
1685-2020 kg3715-4453 lbs
🟒 +83 kg+183 lbs (+5.2%) - 🟒 +481 kg+1060 lbs (+31.3%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

2036-2122 kg4489-4678 lbs
πŸ”΄ -584 kg-1287 lbs (-22.3%) - πŸ”΄ -238 kg-525 lbs (-10.1%)
2360-2620 kg5203-5776 lbs
🟒 +238 kg+525 lbs (+11.2%) - 🟒 +584 kg+1287 lbs (+28.7%)

Roof Load:

-
100 kg220 lbs

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

17-inch rims:
  • 7.0J x 17
18-inch rims:
  • 7.0J x 18
  • 7J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.0J x 20
  • 9.5J x 20
  • 8J x 20
19-inch rims:
  • 7.5J x 19

Tire Size:

  • 225/60 R17 106H (W:225 | H:60 | D:17)
  • 225/60 R18 104W (W:225 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 225/60 R18 (W:225 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 225/60 R18 104W XL (W:225 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 245/45 R20 103W (W:245 | H:45 | D:20)
  • 245/45 R20 (W:245 | H:45 | D:20)
  • 245/45 R20 103W XL (W:245 | H:45 | D:20)
  • 245/50 R19 (W:245 | H:50 | D:19)
  • 275/40 R20 106W (W:275 | H:40 | D:20)
  • 275/40 R20 (W:275 | H:40 | D:20)
  • 275/40 R20 106W XL (W:275 | H:40 | D:20)

Related Comparisons

Quickly compare the size of two vehicles by entering their names in the respective input fields. Hit Compare to view their dimensions head-to-head. Feeling adventurous? Click the Random button for a surprise comparison.

      Small red car