2005 Ford Fusion I vs. 2016 Mazda CX-9 II
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2005 Ford Fusion I (facelift 2005)Change Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2005 Ford Fusion I and the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II comes in at 5065 mm (199.41 in), giving it a 1052 mm (41.42 in) (20.8 %) advantage over the 2005 Ford Fusion I at 4013 mm (157.99 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II stretches to 1969 mm (77.52 in), making it 245 mm (9.65 in) (12.4 %) wider than the 2005 Ford Fusion I at 1724 mm (67.87 in). As for height, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II reaches 1716 mm (67.56 in), which is 173 mm (6.81 in) (10.1 %) taller than the 2005 Ford Fusion I at 1543 mm (60.75 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer, wider and taller than the 2005 Ford Fusion I.

Length
4013 mm158.0 in
5065 mm199.4 in
Width
1724 mm67.9 in
1969 mm77.5 in
Height
1543 mm60.7 in
1716 mm67.6 in

2005 Ford Fusion I Preview
4013 mm158.0 in πŸ”΄ -1052 mm-41.4 in (-20.8%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +1052 mm+41.4 in (+26.2%)
2005 Ford Fusion I Preview
1724 mm67.9 in πŸ”΄ -245 mm-9.6 in (-12.4%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +245 mm+9.6 in (+14.2%)
2005 Ford Fusion I Preview
1543 mm60.7 in πŸ”΄ -173 mm-6.8 in (-10.1%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in 🟒 +173 mm+6.8 in (+11.2%)
2005 Ford Fusion I
2016 Mazda CX-9 II

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

Hatchback
SUV

Model Year:

2005
2016

Production:

2005-2012 Discontinued Model
2016-2023 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4013 mm158.0 in
πŸ”΄ -1052 mm-41.4 in (-20.8%)
5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +1052 mm+41.4 in (+26.2%)

Width:

1724 mm67.9 in
πŸ”΄ -245 mm-9.6 in (-12.4%)
1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +245 mm+9.6 in (+14.2%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

-
2207 mm86.9 in

Height:

1543 mm60.7 in
πŸ”΄ -173 mm-6.8 in (-10.1%)
1716 mm67.6 in
🟒 +173 mm+6.8 in (+11.2%)

Ground Clearance:

160 mm6.3 in
πŸ”΄ -56 mm-2.2 in (-25.9%)
216 mm8.5 in
🟒 +56 mm+2.2 in (+35.0%)

Trunk Capacity:

337 liter11.9 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -70 liter-2.5 cu ft (-17.2%)
407 liter14.4 cu ft
🟒 +70 liter+2.5 cu ft (+20.8%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

1175 liter41.5 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -842 liter-29.7 cu ft (-41.7%)
2017 liter71.2 cu ft
🟒 +842 liter+29.7 cu ft (+71.7%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1075-1115 kg2370-2458 lbs
πŸ”΄ -894 kg-1971 lbs (-45.4%) - πŸ”΄ -722 kg-1592 lbs (-39.3%)
1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
🟒 +722 kg+1592 lbs (+64.8%) - 🟒 +894 kg+1971 lbs (+83.2%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

1605-1675 kg3538-3693 lbs
-

Roof Load:

-
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

  • 16 inches
  • 15 inches
18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20

Tire Size:

  • 195/55 R16 (W:195 | H:55 | D:16)
  • 195/60 R15 (W:195 | H:60 | D:15)
  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car