2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I convertible vs 2004 Cadillac SRX
2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I convertible vs. 2004 Cadillac SRX Dimensions Comparison
Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.
2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I convertible (facelift 2015)Change Car
Here’s how the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I convertible and the 2004 Cadillac SRX compare in size:
In terms of length, the 2004 Cadillac SRX comes in at 4950 mm (194.88 in), giving it a 580 mm (22.83 in) (11.7 %) advantage over the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I convertible at 4370 mm (172.05 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I convertible spans 1980 mm (77.95 in), which is 135 mm (5.31 in) (6.8 %) broader than the 2004 Cadillac SRX at 1845 mm (72.64 in). As for height, the 2004 Cadillac SRX reaches 1670 mm (65.75 in), which is 61 mm (2.40 in) (3.7 %) taller than the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I convertible at 1609 mm (63.35 in).
Overall, the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I convertible is wider than the 2004 Cadillac SRX, while the 2004 Cadillac SRX is longer and taller than the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I convertible.
