2013 Audi Q5 I vs. 2016 Mazda CX-9 II
Dimensions Comparison

Compare the size of two cars side by side and see their differences at a glance. Simply enter the vehicle names, and our tool creates a clear visual comparison of their length, width, and height. This makes it easy to find out which car is longer, wider, or taller, and helps you better understand their overall proportions. Whether you are checking if a car will fit in your garage, comparing everyday models, or exploring larger SUVs, this tool provides a straightforward way to see all key dimensions in one place.

Car #1 Preview Image
2013 Audi Q5 I (8R, facelift 2012)Change Car
Car #2 Preview Image
2016 Mazda CX-9 IIChange Car
Random Comparison

Here’s how the 2013 Audi Q5 I and the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II compare in size:

In terms of length, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II comes in at 5065 mm (199.41 in), giving it a 426 mm (16.77 in) (8.4 %) advantage over the 2013 Audi Q5 I at 4639 mm (182.64 in). Looking at width, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II stretches to 1969 mm (77.52 in), making it 71 mm (2.80 in) (3.6 %) wider than the 2013 Audi Q5 I at 1898 mm (74.72 in). As for height, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II reaches 1716 mm (67.56 in), which is 61 mm (2.40 in) (3.6 %) taller than the 2013 Audi Q5 I at 1655 mm (65.16 in).

Overall, the 2016 Mazda CX-9 II is longer, wider and taller than the 2013 Audi Q5 I.

Length
4639 mm182.6 in
5065 mm199.4 in
Width
1898 mm74.7 in
1969 mm77.5 in
Height
1655 mm65.2 in
1716 mm67.6 in

2013 Audi Q5 I Side View Left
4639 mm182.6 in πŸ”΄ -426 mm-16.8 in (-8.4%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Side View Left
5065 mm199.4 in 🟒 +426 mm+16.8 in (+9.2%)
2013 Audi Q5 I Front View
1898 mm74.7 in πŸ”΄ -71 mm-2.8 in (-3.6%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Front View
1969 mm77.5 in 🟒 +71 mm+2.8 in (+3.7%)
2013 Audi Q5 I Rear View
1655 mm65.2 in πŸ”΄ -61 mm-2.4 in (-3.6%)
2016 Mazda CX-9 II Rear View
1716 mm67.6 in 🟒 +61 mm+2.4 in (+3.7%)
2013 Audi Q5 I
2016 Mazda CX-9 II

Side-by-Side Specs: Dimensions, Weight & More

General Info

Body Style:

SUV
SUV

Model Year:

2013
2016

Production:

2012-2017 Discontinued Model
2016-2023 Discontinued Model

Dimensions

Length:

4629-4639 mm182.2-182.6 in
πŸ”΄ -436 mm-17.2 in (-8.6%) - πŸ”΄ -426 mm-16.8 in (-8.4%)
5065 mm199.4 in
🟒 +426 mm+16.8 in (+9.2%) - 🟒 +436 mm+17.2 in (+9.4%)

Width:

1898 mm74.7 in
πŸ”΄ -71 mm-2.8 in (-3.6%)
1969 mm77.5 in
🟒 +71 mm+2.8 in (+3.7%)

Width (Folded Mirrors):

-
-

Width (Opened Mirrors):

2089 mm82.2 in
πŸ”΄ -118 mm-4.6 in (-5.3%)
2207 mm86.9 in
🟒 +118 mm+4.6 in (+5.6%)

Height:

1655 mm65.2 in
πŸ”΄ -61 mm-2.4 in (-3.6%)
1716 mm67.6 in
🟒 +61 mm+2.4 in (+3.7%)

Ground Clearance:

200 mm7.9 in
πŸ”΄ -16 mm-0.6 in (-7.4%)
216 mm8.5 in
🟒 +16 mm+0.6 in (+8.0%)

Trunk Capacity:

540 liter19.1 cu ft
🟒 +133 liter+4.7 cu ft (+32.7%)
407 liter14.4 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -133 liter-4.7 cu ft (-24.6%)

Trunk Capacity (Max):

1560 liter55.1 cu ft
πŸ”΄ -457 liter-16.1 cu ft (-22.7%)
2017 liter71.2 cu ft
🟒 +457 liter+16.1 cu ft (+29.3%)

Weight Specifications

Curb Weight:

1680-2030 kg3704-4475 lbs
πŸ”΄ -289 kg-637 lbs (-14.7%) - 🟒 +193 kg+425 lbs (+10.5%)
1837-1969 kg4050-4341 lbs
πŸ”΄ -193 kg-425 lbs (-9.5%) - 🟒 +289 kg+637 lbs (+17.2%)

Maximal permitted Weight:

2260-2490 kg4982-5490 lbs
-

Roof Load:

75 kg165 lbs
-

Tire Specifications

Rims Size:

17-inch rims:
  • 8J x 17
18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
19-inch rims:
  • 8J x 19
  • 19
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20
21-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 21
18-inch rims:
  • 8J x 18
20-inch rims:
  • 8.5J x 20

Tire Size:

  • 235/55 R19 (W:235 | H:55 | D:19)
  • 235/60 R18 (W:235 | H:60 | D:18)
  • 235/65 R17 (W:235 | H:65 | D:17)
  • 235/65 R 17 (W:235 | H:65 | D:17)
  • 255/40 R21 (W:255 | H:40 | D:21)
  • 255/45 R20 (W:255 | H:45 | D:20)
  • 255/50 R20 (W:255 | H:50 | D:20)
  • 255/60 R18 (W:255 | H:60 | D:18)

Related Comparisons

1. Use the input field to narrow down the car list (e.g. bmw 2025 or toyota corolla)

2. Select a car from the list below

Small red car