2010 Citroen C4 I Grand Picasso (Phase II, 2010) Dimensions, Size & Specs

With the mirrors opened, the Citroen C4 Grand Picasso's width increases from 1830 mm (72.0 inches) to 2100 mm (82.7 inches). This expanded width is critical for drivers to note when navigating narrow streets, parking garages, or tight parking spaces. Awareness of the mirrors' width helps prevent potential damage and ensures safe maneuvering, especially in urban environments where space can be limited.

The curb weight of the 2010 Citroen C4 Grand Picasso ranges between 1517 kg (3344 lbs) and 1690 kg (3725 lbs), depending on the specific trim and equipment. A moderate curb weight like this strikes a balance between vehicle stability and efficiency. Higher weight can enhance ride comfort and safety, but could slightly reduce fuel efficiency and agility. Conversely, lighter models may offer better fuel economy but can feel less planted on the road.

The maximum weight capacity for the Citroen C4 Grand Picasso ranges between 2100 kg (4629 lbs) and 2325 kg (5125 lbs). This figure includes the combined weight of the vehicle itself, passengers, cargo, and any additional equipment. Understanding the maximum weight is essential for safe loading to avoid overloading, which can negatively affect handling, braking, and overall safety.

With all rear seats in place, the Citroen C4 Grand Picasso offers a luggage capacity of 208 liters (7.3 cubic feet), which is modest but sufficient for daily errands or short trips with passengers. When the rear seats are folded down, the cargo space expands dramatically to 1951 liters (68.9 cubic feet), providing ample room for larger items, luggage, or bulky gear, making it highly versatile for families and outdoor activities.

The roof load capacity of the 2010 Citroen C4 Grand Picasso is rated at 80 kg (176 lbs). This figure is important for safely mounting roof racks, cargo boxes, or sporting equipment such as bicycles and skis. Exceeding this limit can compromise vehicle stability and handling, damage the roof structure, and potentially void vehicle warranties related to roof load accessories.

Standard residential garages typically measure about 2400 mm (94.5 inches) in width and 2100-2200 mm (82.7-86.6 inches) in height. The Citroen C4 Grand Picasso's width with mirrors retracted is 1830 mm (72.0 inches), which fits comfortably inside. However, with mirrors opened, the width increases to 2100 mm (82.7 inches), leaving minimal clearance. Height at 1660 mm (65.4 inches) poses no issues. Drivers should fold mirrors if possible to avoid scratching and ease maneuvering.

Compared to the earlier Citroen C4 Picasso generation, the 2010 Grand Picasso Phase II model is generally longer and wider, enhancing interior space and comfort. The length of 4590 mm (180.7 inches) reflects an increase that allows for a third row of seats, transforming the vehicle into a true 7-seater minivan. The broader width and slightly increased height contribute to a roomier cabin and improved ergonomics, making it better suited for family use and longer journeys.

The Citroen C4 Grand Picasso (2010) competes well within the compact minivan segment. Its length of 4590 mm (180.7 inches) and width of 1830 mm (72.0 inches) place it comfortably among competitors like the Ford C-Max and Renault Scenic. The standout feature is its versatile seating configuration and large cargo capacity of 1951 liters (68.9 cu ft) with folded seats, which often exceeds rivals. While some competitors may offer slightly more powerful engines or luxury features, the Grand Picasso's spaciousness and practical dimensions make it a top choice for families needing flexibility.

The 2010 Citroen C4 Grand Picasso is equipped with rim sizes of 16 and 17 inches, paired with tire sizes of 215/55 R16 and 215/50 R17. The 16-inch wheels tend to offer a more comfortable ride by absorbing road irregularities better, which is beneficial for family-oriented vehicles. Conversely, the 17-inch wheels provide a slightly sportier appearance and potentially better handling due to lower sidewall tire height, but can result in a firmer ride. Both options maintain good grip and stability suitable for a minivan of this class.