2008 Citroen C2 I (Phase II, 2008) Dimensions, Size & Specs

The curb weight of the Citroen C2 I (Phase II, 2008) ranges from approximately 956 kg to 1122 kg (2107 to 2475 pounds), depending on the specific trim and equipment. The maximum gross weight, which includes passengers, cargo, and fuel, ranges between 1336 kg and 1475 kg (2947 to 3251 pounds). This relatively light weight supports agile handling and efficient fuel consumption, typical of subcompact hatchbacks designed primarily for city use.

The standard luggage capacity with rear seats upright is 166 liters (approximately 5.9 cubic feet), which is compact but suitable for everyday errands and small grocery trips. When you fold down the rear seats, the capacity substantially increases to 879 liters (around 31 cubic feet), allowing for much larger items or additional cargo space. This flexibility enhances the practicality of the Citroen C2 I, especially given its compact overall size.

The Citroen C2 I (Phase II) supports various rim sizes, including 5J x 14, 6J x 15, 6.5J x 16, and 5.5J x 14 or 16 inches, offering options depending on trim and customization. Correspondingly, acceptable tire sizes include 175/65 R14, 185/55 R15, and 195/45 R16. These sizes contribute to the car's sporty appearance and influence its handling characteristics, providing a balance between comfort and road-holding capabilities.

Yes, the Citroen C2 I (Phase II, 2008) fits comfortably into a standard garage. With a length of 3666 mm (144.3 inches) and width of 1659 mm (65.3 inches) without mirrors, it leaves ample room for maneuvering in typical residential garages that commonly accommodate cars up to 2 meters (approximately 78.7 inches) wide and over 5 meters (around 196.9 inches) long. Even factoring in the width with mirrors opened (1898 mm or 74.7 inches), the vehicle remains within typical garage door widths, ensuring easy parking and storage.

The Citroen C2 I (Phase II, 2008) continued from the original C2 first phase with minor updates and subtle dimensional changes tailored for improved aesthetics and performance. Generally, the Phase II maintained similar compact dimensions: length around 3666 mm, width near 1659 mm, and height approximately 1474 mm, mirroring the predecessor closely. Weight variations from 956 to 1122 kg also reflect refinements in materials and trim options. Phase II improvements focused more on styling tweaks and equipment rather than substantial size changes, keeping it well-suited for city maneuverability like its predecessor.

When comparing the Citroen C2 I (Phase II, 2008) to similar subcompact hatchbacks such as the Ford Fiesta or Volkswagen Polo, the C2 is competitive in size with a length of 3666 mm and a width of 1659 mm. Its luggage space of 166 liters is somewhat smaller than competitors like the Fiesta, which can offer around 276 liters, but folding rear seats expanding to 879 liters keeps it versatile. The C2's slightly smaller dimensions emphasize its nimbleness in urban environments, though it may trade some cargo volume compared to segment peers.

The roof load capacity of the Citroen C2 I (Phase II) ranges from 50 to 60 kg (110 to 132 pounds). This capacity allows for the attachment of roof racks or roof boxes suitable for bicycles, additional luggage, or sporting equipment, enhancing the vehicle's practicality despite its compact size. However, users should remain mindful of this limit to avoid impacting vehicle stability or damaging the roof structure.

Designed as a compact city car, the Citroen C2 I (Phase II) features a suspension setup aimed at balancing comfort and agile handling. Its relatively low weight (956 - 1122 kg) contributes to responsive steering and good maneuverability. The short length and compact dimensions support easy parking and urban driving, while the suspension is tuned to absorb road imperfections without compromising stability. This ensures that despite its small footprint, the vehicle provides an engaging and pleasant driving experience.

The Citroen C2 I (Phase II, 2008) typically came with a range of small petrol and diesel engines designed for efficiency and city usability. Engine displacements varied, commonly including 1.1-liter, 1.4-liter, and 1.6-liter petrol options, as well as diesel variants around 1.4 liters. Fuel economy was generally favorable, often ranging between 5 to 6 liters per 100 kilometers (approximately 39 to 47 mpg US), depending on engine choice and driving conditions. These engines emphasized low emissions and economical running costs suitable for urban commuters.