2002 Chrysler Voyager IV Dimensions, Size & Specs

The curb weight of the Chrysler Voyager IV ranges between 1750 kg (3860 lbs) and 1980 kg (4367 lbs), depending on the trim and options. This weight range reflects its sturdy build and extensive safety and comfort features typical of minivans from this era. Heavier models might offer more equipment or all-wheel-drive variants, which can slightly impact fuel economy and agility but enhance ride comfort and stability.

The maximum permissible weight (gross vehicle weight rating) of the Chrysler Voyager IV varies from 2450 kg (5401 lbs) to 2595 kg (5720 lbs). This figure includes the vehicle, passengers, cargo, and any accessories. Subtracting the curb weight, it implies a payload capacity spanning roughly 470 kg (1036 lbs) to 845 kg (1863 lbs), allowing for comfortable transport of multiple passengers plus luggage without overloading.

The luggage capacity of the Chrysler Voyager IV with all rear seats in place is 445 liters (approximately 15.7 cubic feet), sufficient for several medium-sized suitcases or daily shopping needs. When rear seats are folded down, the available cargo space expands dramatically to 4080 liters (about 144 cubic feet), making it extremely versatile for large items, bulky cargo, or extended travel with substantial luggage volumes.

A standard garage typically measures around 6 meters (19.7 feet) in length and 3 meters (9.8 feet) in width. With a length of 4.805 meters (15.8 feet) and width of 1.995 meters (6.5 feet, excluding mirrors), the Chrysler Voyager IV fits comfortably into a standard garage with room to spare in length and width. However, careful consideration should be given to garage door width and additional side clearance to ensure smooth entry and exit, especially given the vehicle's minivan design.

The Chrysler Voyager IV generally comes equipped with 16-inch rims paired with tire sizes such as 215/65 R16, 195/65 R16, or 215/65 R15. These tire dimensions are optimized to balance ride comfort, road grip, and durability. Larger tires provide better absorption of road irregularities, contributing to a softer ride, while the tire width supports stability and traction, important for a family-oriented minivan designed to carry passengers safely under different road conditions.

Compared to its predecessor, the Chrysler Voyager III, the Voyager IV is generally larger and heavier. The fourth generation increased its length, width, and interior space to better meet family and cargo needs. Specifically, the Voyager IV at 4805 mm in length and 1995 mm in width is longer and wider, offering more interior room and a more commanding presence on the road. Weight is also up, reflecting additions in safety, comfort, and structural reinforcements, meaning it provides a more refined, spacious, and safer experience overall.

The Chrysler Voyager IV fits well within the typical minivan size range of the early 2000s, such as the Honda Odyssey or Toyota Sienna. Its length of 4805 mm (189.2 inches) and width of 1995 mm (78.5 inches) puts it slightly on the larger side compared to some competitors, offering more interior cargo volume especially with seats folded. It tends to be heavier, reflecting its American build focus on robust structures and passenger comfort. Overall, it competes well by providing generous space and versatility typical of top-tier minivans of the era.

The Chrysler Voyager IV is designed with ample interior space, catering to families and long-distance travelers. With a high roof height of 1750 mm (68.9 inches), passengers enjoy comfortable headroom, while the wide cabin ensures ample shoulder space. The flexible seating layout and huge luggage capacity of up to 4080 liters (144 cubic feet) with rear seats folded give it versatility to carry passengers and bulky gear simultaneously. Comfort features combined with spaciousness make it popular for extended journeys and family use.

The relatively large dimensions and curb weight (1750 to 1980 kg, or 3860 to 4367 lbs) of the Chrysler Voyager IV naturally influence its fuel consumption and driving dynamics. Larger mass requires more energy to accelerate and maintain speeds, and increased frontal area affects aerodynamic drag, which together lower fuel efficiency compared to smaller vehicles. However, the robust build ensures stability and a smooth ride, while the height and width contribute to a commanding road presence. For drivers prioritizing comfort and space, these trade-offs are acceptable, though economy-conscious users might opt for smaller alternatives.