1987 Chrysler Le Baron Dimensions, Size & Specs

The 1987 Chrysler Le Baron has a curb weight ranging between 1315 kg to 1350 kg (approximately 2900 to 2976 lbs), depending on the trim and optional equipment. Its maximum gross weight is 1870 kg (about 4123 lbs). These weights suggest a moderate mass typical for midsize sedans of the late 1980s, allowing for a balance of performance, fuel efficiency, and handling.

The luggage capacity for the 1987 Chrysler Le Baron is 410 liters (about 14.5 cubic feet). This trunk space provides ample room for daily use, travel luggage, or shopping, making it practical for families and commuters alike. The capacity is competitive with other midsize sedans from the same production period.

The 1987 Chrysler Le Baron typically rides on 195/70 R14 or 205/60 R15 tires. The 195/70 R14 tires offer a slightly taller sidewall which can contribute to a smoother ride, while the 205/60 R15 tires provide a sportier stance and potentially better handling characteristics. These tire sizes were common and balanced ride comfort with road grip for a sedan of this era.

Yes, the 1987 Chrysler Le Baron fits comfortably into a standard residential garage. Its dimensions of 4640 mm in length, 1730 mm in width, and 1365 mm in height (182.7 x 68.1 x 53.7 inches) are well within typical garage size constraints. Standard garages typically accommodate vehicles up to around 6 meters (20 feet) long and 2.5 meters (8.2 feet) wide, so parking and maneuvering the Le Baron inside a garage should pose no issues.

The 1987 Chrysler Le Baron, part of the third generation (1986-1994), is generally similar in size to its predecessor generation from the early 1980s but shows slight refinements. The length of 4640 mm (182.7 in) and width of 1730 mm (68.1 in) remain comparable, maintaining a compact-midsize footprint. The curb weight also stays within a similar range, though minor weight reductions were achieved through improved materials and design. Overall, the 1987 model offers slightly better aerodynamic refinement and modernized styling while retaining familiar dimensions, making it a natural evolutionary step rather than a significant size departure.

In its 1987 iteration, the Chrysler Le Baron held its own among midsize sedans like the Ford Taurus, Honda Accord, and Toyota Camry, especially regarding size and luggage capacity. Its length of 4640 mm (182.7 in) and luggage volume of 410 liters (14.5 cu ft) were competitive, offering adequate passenger and cargo space. While some rivals might have offered slightly larger interiors or more advanced features, the Le Baron combined Chrysler's distinctive styling with a balanced size that fit typical suburban and urban driving needs. Its weight was also in line with contemporaries, providing similar handling and fuel efficiency profiles.

The 1987 Chrysler Le Baron stands at a height of 1365 mm (53.7 inches), which is typical for a sedan and allows good headroom inside while maintaining a low center of gravity for improved handling. The relatively low height aids in aerodynamics and gives the car a sleek profile. Ground clearance is modest, suitable for paved roads and light urban conditions rather than off-road use. These dimensions help in easy parking in garages and urban facilities while supporting stable and comfortable handling dynamics.

With a width of 1730 mm (68.1 inches), the 1987 Chrysler Le Baron fits comfortably within standard traffic lanes and provides sufficient shoulder room for front and rear passengers. This width balances passenger comfort with maneuverability, allowing the vehicle to be easily driven and parked in urban environments. The car’s stance on the road also benefits from this width, giving it a stable feel without requiring oversized parking spaces, which is advantageous for daily use in varied driving situations.

The curb weight of the 1987 Chrysler Le Baron ranges from 1315 to 1350 kg (approximately 2900 to 2976 pounds), which is relatively moderate for a midsize sedan of that time. This weight range supports decent fuel efficiency by not being overly heavy while still providing sufficient mass for a stable and comfortable ride. The moderate weight aids in responsive handling and braking while contributing to durability and safety. Overall, this weight strikes a good balance between dynamic performance and economical operation, which was a key consideration for buyers in the late 1980s.