1995 Chevrolet Blazer II Dimensions, Size & Specs

The width of the Chevrolet Blazer II ranges from 1661 mm to 1772 mm, depending on the specific version or wheel setup. In imperial units, this translates to approximately 65.4 inches to 69.7 inches (around 5.45 feet to 5.8 feet). The variation in width allows for different tire and suspension setups, which can impact off-road performance and interior shoulder room. This width is typical for SUVs from the mid-1990s.

The height of the Chevrolet Blazer II varies between 1593 mm and 1702 mm, which equals approximately 62.7 inches to 67 inches, or 5.23 feet to 5.58 feet. This variance is influenced by factors such as trim level, suspension setup, and optional features like roof racks or lift kits. The height provides a commanding view of the road typical for SUVs of its class, as well as sufficient ground clearance for mild off-roading.

The curb weight of the Chevrolet Blazer II ranges from 1542 kg to 1860 kg. In pounds, this is roughly between 3401 lbs and 4101 lbs. Curb weight refers to the total weight of the vehicle with standard equipment, all necessary operating consumables like oil and fuel, but without passengers or cargo. This weight range reflects the model variation; heavier trims may have more equipment or four-wheel-drive systems that contribute to added mass.

The maximum permissible weight for the Chevrolet Blazer II ranges from 2170 kg to 2440 kg, which converts to approximately 4785 lbs to 5381 lbs. This figure includes the curb weight plus the weight of passengers, cargo, and any additional load. It reflects the maximum safe operating weight for the vehicle, which is essential for towing, carrying capacity, and overall safety to avoid overloading the SUV beyond its design limits.

With the rear seats in place, the Chevrolet Blazer II offers a luggage capacity ranging between 845 liters and 1056 liters (approximately 29.8 to 37.3 cubic feet). When the rear seats are folded down, this expands significantly to between 1717 liters and 2098 liters, which converts to about 60.6 to 74.1 cubic feet. This flexibility allows owners to accommodate larger loads or increase passenger comfort by choosing between passenger and cargo space.

Yes, the Chevrolet Blazer II generally fits into a standard residential garage. Residential garages usually provide a minimum height clearance of around 2.13 meters (84 inches or 7 feet) and width of at least 2.44 meters (96 inches or 8 feet). Given the Blazer II's maximum height is approximately 1.7 meters (67 inches or 5.58 feet) and width tops at 1.77 meters (69.7 inches or 5.8 feet), it comfortably fits within these dimensions. However, tight garages or those with storage items may require careful maneuvering.

The Chevrolet Blazer II succeeded the original K5 Blazer, bringing a more modern SUV design typical of the mid-1990s. Compared to its predecessor, the Blazer II is slightly smaller and lighter, with lengths generally ranging from 4420 mm to 4602 mm, whereas the K5 was longer. The newer Blazer also featured updated styling, better fuel efficiency, and improved interior comfort. Width and height measurements reflect a design that favors road usability and family friendliness over the rugged off-road appearance of its predecessor.

In the mid-1990s SUV category, the Chevrolet Blazer II was a competitive mid-size SUV. Its length (4420 to 4602 mm or 174 to 181 inches) and width (1661 to 1772 mm or 65 to 70 inches) were comparable with rivals such as the Ford Explorer and Jeep Grand Cherokee. Cargo space was generous, with up to around 2098 liters (74.1 cubic feet) when rear seats were folded, which was competitive for its class. This made the Blazer II a practical choice for families looking for a versatile SUV.

The Chevrolet Blazer II came equipped with several tire sizes including 235/75 R15, 235/70 R15, 205/75 R15 P, and 205/75 R15 S. The common 15-inch rim diameter helped balance ride comfort and ground clearance. The 235 mm wide tires offered improved traction and stability, especially for off-road driving and towing, while the 205 mm wide options favored fuel economy and a smoother ride on paved roads. Tire choice impacts handling, grip, and overall driving experience.